Cell videos catch asbestos in the act – how asbestos fibers cause cancer
Molecular moviemakers have produced the first graphic evidence suggesting why the size of an asbestos fiber plays a key role in its toxicity. Another research team has shown that asbestos can activate a versatile enzyme present in all living cells, turning on cell proliferation. Together, the new findings provide important clues to how needle-like asbestos fibers trigger cancer.
Asbestos, a potent carcinogen, has long eluded attempts to discover its biological mode of action. Several hints have emerged in recent years, however. For instance, unlike most carcinogens, asbestos fibers do not cause cells to mutate. And many studies indicate that straight asbestos fibers — especially long, thin ones — are more carcinogenic than curly ones (SN: 2/3/90, p.79).
New videos of lung cells exposed to needle-like crocidolite asbestos now suggest why. Conly L. Rieder and his colleagues worked with cells from newts. “There’s no way the studies we’re doing right now could be conducted in human or rat cells because they’re too little,” explains Rieder, who directs the NIH Biological Microscopy and Image Reconstruction National Resource at the Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, in Albany, N.Y.
The team’s live-action movies, described in the Sept. 15 CANCER RESEARCH, show that a lung cell incorporates crocidolite fibers by encapsulating each in a membrane sac called an endosome.
The researchers found that endosomes carrying crocidolite fibers 5 micrometers or smaller quickly begin speeding toward the cell nucleus via microtubules — elaborate, filamentous roadways along which the cell shuttles its inner “vehicles.” Endosomes holding larger fibers never make it onto these roadways; instead, they slowly move toward the nucleus through Brownian motion.
Rieder’s group worked with cultured, nondividing cells. However, he says, the new findings suggest that in a dividing cell, endosomes with small asbestos fibers would continue to scoot along the tubule roadway, but away from the region of the dividing chromosomes. If so, this could spare the chromosomes from potentially carcinogenic asbestos-induced changes, he says. Because the microtubules appear to ignore endosome-enclosed fibers larger than 5 micrometers, Rieder says he suspects that any such fibers near the nucleus when a cell begins to divide will stay there — ideally placed to “gum up” chromosome division. It’s something he hopes to film in follow-up investigations of dividing cells.
Rieder’s study “is a very elegant demonstration of the mechanisms by which asbestos fibers are incorporated into cells – one that I think will yield new insights into our understanding of the consequences of asbestos exposures and perhaps the importance of fiber size,” says J. Carl Barrett, a molecular biologist at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in Research Triangle Park, N.C.
In new work at the University of Vermont College of Medicine in Burlington, scientists have shown that “mechanistically, asbestos acts through a pathway which turns on cell proliferation — like a classic tumor promoter,” says study coauthor Brooke T. Mossman. Using hamster lung cells, her team observed that crocidolite can activate an enzyme, protein kinase C (PKC), in the cell’s outer membrane. When activated, PKC signals the cell to begin proliferating. However, unlike “classic” chemical tumor promoters such as phorbol esters, asbestos “does not appear to activate PKC by a receptor-like interaction,” the researchers report in the September CARCINOGENESIS. The insoluble asbestos fibers may instead trigger PKC activation by some unknown change in the membrane, they say.
The new studies suggest that multiple mechanisms contribute to asbestos carcinogenesis, says Barrett, whose own work focuses on the activation of cancercausing genes and inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes in an asbestos-induced cancer known as mesothelioma.
COPYRIGHT 1991 Science Service, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group