Cities at the forefront – Population Growth and Urbanization – Abstract
Cities in the developing world are at the forefront of the global struggle to achieve better living standards. How urban residents and their governments meet the challenges of rapid population growth and development will largely determine the kind of world that lies ahead.
Marina Lupina and her two children live in one of Manila’s largest slum areas, in a shack built from discarded waste next to a refuse-clogged canal. They have no running water, no electricity, and little furniture–a bed where all three sleep, a table, and three chairs. Her husband disappeared after the second child was born. By selling recycled cloth, Marina earns just enough to buy rice, fish, and clothing. Like millions of others in the big cities of developing countries, she has come for a better life. Despite her poverty, she believes that she and her children have more opportunity in the city than if they had remained in the countryside.
Within five years half the world’s population will live in cities. By 2030 the urban population will reach 4.9 billion–60% of the world’s population (28) (see Figure, p. 2). Nearly all population growth will be in the cities of developing countries, whose population will double to nearly 4 billion by 2030–about the size of the developing world’s total population in 1990.
“The explosive growth of cities in developing countries will test the capacity of governments to stimulate the investment required to generate jobs and to provide the services, infrastructure, and social supports necessary to sustain livable and stable environments,” warns an assessment of expert opinion prepared by the US National Intelligence Council in 2000 (16). Developing countries also will face intensified environmental problems due to urbanization.
How can living conditions improve for the millions of people densely packed into cities without destroying the natural resource base on which improved living standards depend? Meeting the challenges posed by rapid urbanization could be as important for the future as addressing rapid population growth itself has been over the last 50 years.
Developing World Becoming Urban
The developing world has been predominantly rural but is quickly becoming urban. In 1950 only 18% of people in developing countries lived in cities. In 2000 the proportion was 40%, and by 2030 the developing world will be 56% urban (2, 28). While the developed world is more urban, estimated at 76% urban in 2000, developing countries have much faster urban population growth–an average annual growth rate of 2.3%, which far exceeds the developed world’s urban growth rate of 0.4% (28).
Rapid urban growth in developing countries reflects substantial migration to cities from rural areas and also natural population increase (the net effect of births minus deaths) among city residents. On average, of these two sources of urban population growth, natural increase plays the greater role. Among developing countries, excluding China, for example, an estimated 60% of urban growth between 1960 and 1990 was from natural increase and 40% from in-migration from rural areas and the expansion of urban boundaries (2).
Some cities, however, are growing two or three times faster than the country’s overall population, reflecting massive migration to cities (7, 10). For example, Dhaka grew in population by an average of nearly 7% per year from 1975 to 2000 compared with an annual average of 2.1% for Bangladesh as a whole. In the same period, the population of Lagos grew at an average of 5.6% per year compared with 3% for Nigeria as a whole (28, 31).
Megacities. More and more people of the developing world live in “megacities,” or cities of at least 10 million people. In 1975 only five cities worldwide had 10 million or more inhabitants, of which three were in developing countries. The number will increase to 23 by 2015, all but 4 of them in developing countries. By then, Bombay, Dhaka, Lagos, and Sao Paulo each will have over 20 million residents (see Table, p. 3) (28). Also, by 2015 an estimated 564 cities around the world will contain 1 million or more residents. Of these, 425 will be in developing countries (2).
The Urban Dilemma
The rapid growth of cities in developing countries presents a dilemma. Cities historically have been centers of industry and commerce and magnets for millions of people. Today, however, the sheer size of cities and the rapid, continuing influx of urban migrants cast doubt on their ability to continue providing improved standards of living.
While there is no evidence that a threshold population size exists beyond which “cities generate more negative than positive effects for their countries” (2), in many cities the rapid pace of population growth and enormous size of the population have overwhelmed the capacity of municipal authorities to respond. Over 600 million people in the cities of developing countries cannot meet their basic needs for shelter, water, food, health, and education (6). Recent migrants to cities are particularly vulnerable, often clustered in slums with little access to jobs or services (9).
In 1987 the World Commission on Environment and Development stated that, “in the space of one decade, the developing world will have to increase by 65% its capacity to produce and manage its urban infrastructure, services, and shelter–merely to maintain present conditions” (29, 35). That challenge has not been met. The infrastructure in most cities of developing countries has not been able to keep up with rapid population growth and the unplanned expansion of industries (23).
Still, people keep moving to cities. For all their problems, big cities in developing countries continue to be centers of economic activity, offering more potential than most rural areas can offer (8). Cities will continue growing as millions of people leave behind deteriorating rural economies, flee wars and civil strife, or relocate as population pressures overwhelm agricultural land and rural environments (2, 15, 17). If cities are not able to cope with the influx, however, poverty and hopelessness could become widespread, leading to rising discontent and civil unrest (2, 12).
Health and Pollution
Around the world, atmospheric pollution afflicts more than 1.1 billion people, mostly in cities (21). Another 2.5 billion are at risk from high levels of indoor air pollution (22). Indoor and outdoor air pollution together kill nearly 3 million people every year–about 6% of all deaths annually–and 90% occur in developing countries (18, 26, 36). As cities expand, urban air pollution worsens. In most big cities vehicle exhaust levels already are so severe that pollution-related ailments cost huge amounts for medical care and in worker absenteeism (14, 29).
Both water scarcity and water pollution are serious urban problems. Dirty water is by far the largest environmental killer around the world, claiming some 5 to 12 million lives a year, depending on the definition of water-related disease (4). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the majority of urban populations in developing countries do not have access to proper sanitation facilities–a flush toilet, sanitary latrine, or a pit that can be covered over–and about half lack a regular supply of potable water (36).
Environmental Impact of Cities
Cities have a huge impact on the natural environment. As cities grow ever larger, they consume more and more natural resources to meet the rising demand for food, water, energy, and goods and services, both from people and industry (13, 30). Cities generate close to 80% of all carbon dioxide emissions and account for three-quarters of industrial wood use. Some 60% of all freshwater withdrawn for human use ends up in urban areas–either directly for use in factories and for drinking and sanitation, or indirectly through the consumption of irrigated crops (18).
The economic and environmental reach of the city goes far beyond the city limits. Modern high-density settlements now appropriate the ecological output and life-support functions of distant regions through trade and commerce, the generation and disposal of wastes, and the alteration of nature’s cycles. As cities continue to attract more people and produce and consume more, they become “black holes” that soak up the ecological output of entire regions (20).
What Can Be Done?
Alarmed by massive population growth, worsening living conditions, and environmental degradation, some experts worry that cities in developing countries have become unmanageable. Others are more optimistic, observing that with good management cities can grow even larger without making residents worse off and without ruining the surrounding environment (2, 3).
While many city governments face unprecedented challenges, a number of steps can make cities more livable and protect the environment. These include better urban planning, more public transportation, better sanitation and rational water use policies, energy conservation, urban farming, and waste recycling. In addition, slower population growth would ease pressures on cities and buy time to find solutions.
Better planning and public transportation. In many cities better planning, coupled to effective zoning, could improve the quality of life for urban residents and protect the environment. For example, zoning could locate polluting industries away from residential areas. Green belts around highways and industrial centers could cut down on congestion and pollution. Effective city planning requires strong local government supported by active citizen groups working for improvements in the quality of life (37).
One of the best investments cities can make–both environmental and economic–is in efficient mass transportation systems. A good mass transportation system can create jobs by providing an affordable way for residents to reach places of employment. It also can greatly reduce pollution by reducing the demand for private vehicles. WHO estimates that about 700,000 deaths annually could be prevented in urban areas of developing countries if the three major pollutants–carbon monoxide, suspended particulate matter, and lead–were brought down to safe levels defined by WHO (5, 36).
Providing water, improving health. Many cities in developing countries are growing so fast that they cannot manage the water supply. In developing countries as much as 70% of the water pumped into cities is lost before it can reach consumers, leaking out of faulty water mains, pipes, and faucets (33).
Cities can gain a great deal from adopting water conservation measures. A key to urban water conservation is pricing water to reflect its value as a scarce resource. Pricing water minimally or not at all encourages waste. Charging higher prices would not necessarily deny water to low-income areas, however. In Tegucigalpa, Honduras, for example, six neighborhoods together approached the city water authority with a request to provide piped water. Consumers themselves paid for the water connections. Nevertheless, the price that households paid for water dropped because residents no longer had to buy expensive water from street vendors, and the quality of their water improved (19).
Conserving energy. Developing-country governments have far to go in encouraging more efficient energy use. Energy prices often drop dramatically for consumers when utilities invest in energy efficiency. More efficient energy use also is a good investment for utilities because it helps avoid the need to build costly power plants, and it reduces the amount of pollutants pumped into the atmosphere.
The “energy crisis” of the early 1970s caused a surge of energy efficiency measures in Europe and the US. By 1985 the use of more efficient household appliances, along with more stringent efficiency standards required in buildings, brought dramatic energy savings to US consumers and helped make it possible for US utilities to avoid building 350 megawatts worth of power plants. These innovations helped spawn a US$3 billion-per-year energy conservation industry, funded by the utilities, whose average payback time on investment in energy conservation was only about one year (11, 34).
Urban farming and recycling. Urban farming helps feed city residents. It also helps protect the environment by reducing the need to bring in food. The UN Development Program has estimated that about 800 million urban and peri-urban farmers produce over 15% of the world’s food (27). If city governments adopted explicit policies and incentives to encourage urban agriculture, the number of urban farmers would likely increase substantially.
Until the mid-1990s, when massive population growth and rising demand overwhelmed local food supplies, urban farmers in China’s 18 largest cities were able to produce over 90% of locally consumed vegetables and half of all the meat and poultry. Hong Kong still produces two-thirds of the poultry, half the vegetables, and 40% of the fish it consumes. Singapore produces all of its meat and fish and one-quarter of its vegetables (18, 27).
Recycling–converting mountains of urban waste into new resources–also makes sense both economically and environmentally. Economically, for every 1 million tons of solid waste, about 1,600 recycling jobs could be created in developed and developing countries alike, according to industry surveys (38). Recycling, of course, benefits the environment by saving natural resources and reducing the amount of trash in landfills or dumped into rivers, lakes, and oceans.
Population and Family Planning: Toward Sustainable Cities
Worries about a global “population bomb” may have lessened as fertility rates have fallen in most developing countries. Nevertheless, the world’s population continues to grow by nearly 77 million people each year–almost all in developing countries. Urban areas are gaining about 60 million people per year (24, 28). While fertility has fallen to replacement level in 61 countries–13 of them in the developing world–about 1.8 billion people live in 43 countries where fertility averages between three and five children per woman. In 48 other countries with a combined population of about 760 million, the average woman has more than five children (24).
Since the 1960s family planning programs have played a key role–perhaps the key role–in slowing population growth in developing countries (32). Between 20% and 50% of the fertility decline in developing countries has come as a direct result of family planning programs (1).
Today, for the urban areas of developing countries, meeting the family planning needs of city residents is a promising strategy not only to improve health but also to slow population growth (2). In particular, programs can do more to reach the urban poor, including recent migrants, who live in areas that often have not been served well (9). By enabling people to have the number of children they want, family planning programs can help make cities more livable today while, by slowing population growth, they help safeguard natural resources needed for the future.
Cities with 10 Million or More Inhabitants,
1975, 2000, and 2015 (Population in Millions)
New York 15.9
Mexico City 11.2
Sao Paulo 10.0
Mexico City 18.1
Sao Paulo 17.8
New York 16.6
Los Angeles 13.1
Buenos Aires 12.6
Metro Manila 10.9
Rio de Janeiro 10.6
Sao Paulo 20.4
Mexico City 19.2
New York 17.4
Metro Manila 14.8
Los Angeles 14.1
Buenos Aires 14.1
Rio de Janeiro 11.9
UN Population Division,
March 2000 (28)
This Istanbul +5 Special Session edition of Population Reports is a preview of a larger report on urbanization, to be published next year. Population Reports presents an accurate and authoritative overview of developments in population, family planning, and related health topics.
Copies of Population Reports are free in any ,quantity to developing countries. In developed countries, multiple copies are US$2 each. To reserve a copy of the full-length report, and for subscriptions to Population Reports, write to the publisher:
Population Information Program
Center for Communication Programs
Johns Hopkins University
School of Public Health
111 Market Place, Suite 310
Baltimore, MD 21202, USA.
Fax: (410) 659-2645
(1.) AHLBURG, D.A. and DIAMOND, I. Evaluating the impact of family planning programmes. In: AHLBURG, D.A., KELLEY, A.C., and MASON, K.O., eds. The impact of population growth on well-being in developing countries. Berlin, Germany, Springer-Verlag. 1996. p. 299-335.
(2.) BROCKHERHOFF, M.P. An urbanizing world. Population Bulletin 55(3): 3-44. 2000.
(3.) CHEEMA, G.S. Priority urban management issues in developing countries: The research agenda for the 1990s. In: Megacity growth and the future. Edited by Roland J. Fuchs, Ellen Brennan, Joseph Chamie, Fu-chen Lo, and Juha I. Uitto. Tokyo, Japan, United Nations University Press, 1994 p. 412-428.
(4.) DAVlDSON, J., MYERS, D., and CHAKRABORTY, M. No time to waste: Poverty and the global environment. Oxford, England, Oxfam, 1992. 217 p.
(5.) DE SOUZA, R.M. Household transportation use and urban air pollution. Washington, D.C., Population Reference Bureau, 1999.
(6.) ELGENDY, H., INSTITUT FUR STADTEBAU UND LANDES-PLANUNG DER UNIVERSITAT KARKSRUHE. Global Trends: Urbanization.
(7.) ENGELMAN, R. Why population matters. Washington, D.C., Population Action International, 1997.53 p.
(8.) FEUERSTEIN, M.T. Poverty and health: Reaping a richer harvest. London, Macmillan Education, 1997. 220 p.
(9.) GARDNER, R. and BLACKBURN, R. People who move: New reproductive health focus. Population Reports, Series J, No. 45. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information Program, November 1996. 28 p.
(10.) GELBARD, A., HAUB, C., and KENT, M. World population beyond six billion. Population Bulletin 54(1): 3-40. Mar. 1999.
(11.) HINRICHSEN, D. Selling energy conservation. People & the Planet 4(1): 18. 1995.
(12.) HOMER-DIXON, T. and PERCIVAL, V. Environmental scarcity and violent conflict: Briefing book. Washington D.C., American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project on Environment, Population and Security, 1996.61 p.
(13.) INTER-AMERICAN PARLIAMENTARY GROUP ON POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT (IAPG). Population growth and the environment. 1991.10 p.
(14.) MYERS, N. Population, resources and the environment–The critical challenges. New York, UNFPA, 118 p.
(15.) MYERS, N. and KENT, J. Environmental exodus: An emergent crisis in the global arena. Washington, D.C., Climate Institute, 1995. 160 p.
(16.) NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL. Global trends 2015: A dialogue about the future with nongovernment experts. Langley, Virginia, National Foreign Intelligence Board, Dec. 2000. 98 p.
(17.) NESS, G.D. Population, development and global change. POPULI 18(1): 24-33. Mar. 1991.
(18.) O’MEARA, M. Reinventing cities for people and the planet. Washington, D.C., Worldwatch Institute, 1999. 68 p.
(19.) RAY, K. and KAKBEEKE, W.J. Community participation in urban water and sanitation: The missing link in public-private partnership. Presented at the International Conference on Water and Sustainable Development, Paris, March 19-21. 1998.12 p.
(20.) REES, W. Ecological footprints of the future. People & the Planet 5(2): 6-9. 1996.
(21.) ROODMAN, D. The natural wealth of nations–Harnessing the market for the environment. New York, W.W. Norton & Company, 246 p.
(22.) SCHWELA, D. Cooking smoke: A silent killer. People & the Planet 6(3): 24-25. 1997.
(23.) UNITED NATIONS (UN). DEPARTMENT FOR POLICY COORDINATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Critical Trends–Global change and sustainable development. New York, United Nations, 1997. 76 p.
(24.) UNITED NATIONS (UN). DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS POPULATION DIVISION. World population prospects: The 2000 revision. Highlights. New York, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, Feb. 28, 2001. 49 p.
(25.) UNITED NATIONS (UN). ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL. World demographic trends. Report of the Secretary-General. Jan. 4, 1999. 17 p.
(26.) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (UNDP). Human development report 1998. New York, UNDP, 1998. 106 p.
(27.) UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (UNDP). Urban agriculture–Food, jobs and sustainable cities. New York, UNDP, 1996. 205 p.
(28.) UNITED NATIONS POPULATION DIVISION. World urbanization prospects: The 1999 revision. New York, United Nations Population Division, 2000. 128 p.
(29.) UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND (UNFPA). Population and the environment: The challenges ahead. New York, UNFPA, 1991.30 p.
(30.) UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND (UNFPA). Six billion: A time for choices. The state of world population 1999. New York, UNFPA, 1999.62 p.
(31.) UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU. International Data Base. .
(32.) UPADHYAY, U.D. and ROBEY, B. Why family planning matters. Population Reports, Series J, No. 49. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Population Information Program, July 1999, 32 p.
(33.) WARNER, D. Drinking water supply and environmental sanitation for health. Presented at the International Conference of Water and Sustainable Development. Paris, 1998. 10 p.
(34.) WEIZSACKER, E., LOVINS, A., and LOVINS, L.H. Factor four–Doubling wealth, halving resource use. London, Earthscan Publications, 1998. 299 p.
(35.) WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (WCED). Our common future. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1987. 383 p.
(36.) WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). Health and the environment in sustainable development–Five years after the earth summit. Geneva, WHO, 1997. 133 p.
(37.) WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE, UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME, UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME, and WORLD BANK. The urban environment. A guide to the global environment. A special reprint from World Resources, 1996-97. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996. 156 p.
(38.) YOUNG, J. The materials revolution. People & the Planet 4(1): 13. 1995.
This issue of Population Reports was prepared by Don Hinrichsen, Richard Blackburn, and Bryant Robey. Stephen M. Goldstein, Managing Editor. Linda D. Sadler, Designer. Production by John Fiege.
Phyllis Tilson Piotrow, Ph.D., Director, Center for Communication Programs and Principal Investigator, Population Information Program. Ward Rinehart, Project Director.
The Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs, including the Population Information Program and Population Communication Services, provides leadership, technical assistance, and support for family planning and related health communication to health professionals, their clients, and the public.
Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Global, G/PHN/POP/CMT, HRN-A-00-97-0009-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Agency for International Development or the Johns Hopkins University.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Department of Health
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group