‘Enhanced’ White House e-mail exasperates some
‘Enhanced’ White House e-mail exasperates some
By JOHN MARKOFF New York Times
Friday, July 18, 2003
Do you want to send an e-mail message to the White House?
In the past, to tell President Bush — or at least those assigned to read his mail — what was on your mind it was only necessary to sit down at a personal computer connected to the Internet and dash off an e-mail note to firstname.lastname@example.org.
But this week, Tom Matzzie, an online organizer with the AFL-CIO, discovered that communicating with the White House has become a bit more daunting. When he sent an e-mail protest against a Bush administration policy, the message was bounced back with an automated reply, saying that he had to send it again in a new way.
Under a system that was deployed on the White House Web site for the first time last week, those who want to send a message to Bush must now navigate as many as nine Web pages and fill out a detailed form that starts by asking whether the message sender supports White House policy or differs with it.
The White House says the new system, located on the Web at http:// whitehouse. gov/webmail, is an effort to be more responsive to the public and offer the administration “real-time” access to citizen comments.
To complete a message to the president also requires choosing a subject from the provided list, then entering a full name, organization, address and e-mail address. Once the message is sent, the writer must wait for an automated response to the e-mail address listed, asking whether the addressee intended to send the message. The message is delivered to the White House only after the person using that e-mail address confirms it.
Jimmy Orr, a White House spokesman, described the system as an “enhancement” aimed at improving communications. He called it a “work in progress,” and advised members of the public who had sensitive or personal matters to bring up with Bush to use traditional methods of communications, like a letter on paper, a fax or a phone call.
He said that the White House, which gets about 15,000 electronic messages a day, had designed the new system during the last nine months in partnership with a private firm he wouldn’t identify.
“It provides an additional means for individuals to inquire about policy issues at the White House and get a personalized response in 24 to 48 hours,” said Orr, the White House’s Internet news director.
It is still possible to send a traditional e-mail message, he said, but the sender will receive the automated reply and there is no guarantee it will be read or responded to.
Some Internet usability experts think the new method for sending messages is not doing much to enhance communications between the White House and the public.
“Overall it’s a very cumbersome process,” said Jakob Nielsen, an authority on Web design who helps run a consulting group, Nielsen Norman Group, in Fremont, Calif. “It’s probably designed deliberately to cut down on their e-mail.”
The White House said it was taking its critics in stride.
“When it comes to a Web site, it’s a bit like a movie,” Orr said. “Some will say it’s a tour de force, some will say it fell flat.”
He contended that the new procedure provides a straightforward way for a citizen to let an opinion be known and receive a quick, tailored response from the White House.
Acknowledging that there had been some glitches in the first few days, Orr said the new system was being improved. “Having tried it myself,” he said, “I would say it’s pretty user friendly.”
The various categories for describing a message’s subject is also a big muddle, he said.
“One of the categories is National ID Card,” he said. “Does it mean you’re in favor of National ID or in favor of the president’s position, which it doesn’t describe?”
Matzzie, the AFL-CIO organizer, discovered the new White House e- mail system when he launched a campaign to protest the Bush administration’s proposals changing the way overtime pay is to be calculated.
He said he particularly disliked being forced to specify whether he was offering a “supporting comment” or a “differing opinion” to Bush.
“Can’t I just say something or ask a question?” he said.
Matzzie was also upset that none of the many categories listed included either “unemployment” or “jobs.”
“This is the most ridiculous Web form for contacting someone I have ever seen,” said Matzzie, a professional Web site designer and an online organizer for the labor organization.
Having sent his e-mail message Tuesday, Matzzie was still waiting for a response.
Copyright 2003 Journal Sentinel Inc. Note: This notice does not
apply to those news items already copyrighted and received through
wire services or other media
Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved.