Preparation and comprehensive characterization of a calcium hydroxyapatite reference material

Preparation and comprehensive characterization of a calcium hydroxyapatite reference material

Milenko Markovic

Numerous biological and chemical studies involve the use of calcium hydroxyapatite (HA), [Ca.sub.10](P[O.sub.4])[.sub.6](OH)[.sub.2]. In this study detailed physicochemical characterization of HA, prepared from an aqueous solution, was carried out employing different methods and techniques: chemical and thermal analyses, x-ray diffraction, infrared and Raman spectroscopies, scanning and transmission microscopies, and Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) surface-area method. The contents of calcium ([Ca.sup.2+]), phosphate (P[O.sub.4.sup.3-]), hydroxide (O[H.sup.-]), hydrogenphosphate (HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-]), water ([H.sub.2]O), carbonate (C[O.sub.3.sup.2-]), and trace constituents, the Ca/P molar ratio, crystal size and morphology, surface area, unit-cell parameters, crystallinity, and solubility of this HA were determined. This highly pure, homogeneous, and highly crystalline HA is certified as a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard reference material, SRM 2910.

Key words: chemical analysis; crystal size; crystallinity; hydroxyapatite; infrared; morphology; preparation; Raman; solubility; surface area; thermal analysis; unit-cell parameters; x-ray diffraction.

**********

1. Introduction

Calcium hydroxyapatite (HA), [Ca.sub.10](P[O.sub.4])[.sub.6](OH)[.sub.2], is an important inorganic material in biology and chemistry [1-3]. Biological apatites, which are the inorganic constituents of bone, tooth enamel and dentin, are typically very variable in their composition and morphology, and contain different impurities ([Mg.sup.2+], [K.sup.+], [Na.sup.+], C[O.sub.3.sup.2-], HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-], [Cl.sup.-], [F.sup.-], etc.) [1]. In general, these impure biological apatites are designated as calcium deficient or non-stoichiometric apatites.

Synthetic HAs are frequently used as reference materials in biomineralization and biomaterial studies. The composition, physicochemical properties, crystal size and morphology of synthetic apatites are extremely sensitive to preparative conditions. Common impurity phases in synthetic apatites prepared by precipitation from supersaturated aqueous solutions are calcium phosphate compounds such as amorphous calcium phosphates (ACP) with variable compositions of [Ca.sub.3](P[O.sub.4])[.sub.2-2x](HP[O.sub.4])[.sub.3x] * n[H.sub.2]O, octacalcium phosphate (OCP), [Ca.sub.8](HP[O.sub.4])[.sub.2](P[O.sub.4])[.sub.4] * 5[H.sub.2]O, and calcium hydrogenphosphate dihydrate (DCPD), CaHP[O.sub.4] * 2[H.sub.2]O. In addition, the incorporation of various ions as trace impurities (hydrogenphosphate, carbonate, silicate ions, etc.) is very difficult to prevent in any preparative procedure of HA [3].

For control and reference purposes, it is important to have available pure and stoichiometric HA, or nearly stoichiometric HA, characterized in detail with respect to its chemical composition and numerous other important properties. To meet this need, a large amount of highly pure, homogeneous and highly crystalline HA was synthesized by precipitation from aqueous solution of calcium hydroxide and phosphoric acid and then rigorously characterized by chemical and thermal analyses, infrared (IR) and Raman spectroscopies, powder x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning and transmission microscopies, and surface area and solubility product [4] measurements. The chemical composition and other analyzed properties of this HA qualify it as a standard reference material (NIST, SRM 2910) [5] and it is here-after denoted as HA-SRM.

Synthetic HA occurs in two structural forms, hexagonal and monoclinic, which have minor structural differences [2]. The hexagonal HA form is usually formed by precipitation from supersaturated solutions at 25 [degrees]C to 100 [degrees]C and the monoclinic form of HA is primarily formed by heating the hexagonal form at 850 [degrees]C in air and then cooling to room temperature [6]. The overall XRD patterns of hexagonal and monoclinic HA are almost identical; however the pattern of monoclinic HA has additional weak lines whose intensities are less than 1% of the strongest hexagonal HA line [7]. The HA-SRM analyzed here is composed of the hexagonal form (mass fraction of about 75%) and of the monoclinic form (mass fraction of about 25%) as determined by normalized additional XRD measurements of the weak line of monoclinic HA at 2[theta] = 36.28[degrees] [6-8]. Only the hexagonal form, the major component in HA-SRM, is discussed in this paper. Preparation and characterization of the monoclinic form of HA and differences between the hexagonal and monoclinic HA will be discussed in a separate paper [8].

2. Experimental Section

2.1 Preparation

Calcium hydroxyapatite-standard reference material (HA-SRM) was synthesized by solution reaction of calcium hydroxide and phosphoric acid in accordance with the preparation of McDowell et al. [9]. In brief, about 5 L of distilled water was boiled for 60 min in a 7.5 L Teflon-coated pot equipped with an electric stirring paddle, a reflux condenser with a C[O.sub.2]-absorbing NaOH trap to protect from atmospheric C[O.sub.2], and ports for introducing titrant and nitrogen gas. Calcium oxide (prepared from calcium carbonate heated for 3 h at 1100 [degrees]C) was added to the water. Phosphoric acid (concentration 2 mol/L) was added to the calcium oxide/calcium hydroxide slurry at a rate of 0.3 mL/min to 0.6 mL/min and to a final Ca/P molar ratio of 1.67. The reacting mixture was boiled for 2 d. The precipitated solid phase was allowed to settle, the supernatant decanted, and an equal volume of boiled distilled water was added. This suspension was boiled for another 2 d. These washing and boiling procedures were repeated four times until the pH of the supernatant was [approximately equal to]6; at pH 6, any possible traces of anhydrous dicalcium hydrogenphosphate (DCPA) are converted into HA. The precipitate, collected by filtration, was thoroughly washed with acetone, and then dried at 105 [degrees]C for 1 d. The yield was about 1 kg.

2.2 Characterization

The HA-SRM was characterized using different methods and techniques. Twenty randomly selected samples were analyzed for both calcium and total phosphorus content. Four samples were analyzed for the content of phosphorus in the form of hydrogenphosphate (HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-]). Fourteen samples were analyzed for water content. Twelve samples were analyzed for carbonate content. The contents of silicon and other trace constituents were determined in one sample. The specific surface area was determined on twelve samples. In addition, scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM), x-ray diffraction (XRD), and infrared (IR) and Raman spectroscopies were employed for detailed characterization.

2.3 Chemical Analyses

2.3.1 Calcium Content

Calcium was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy with a Perkin-Elmer Model 603 spectrophotometer (1) using an air-acetylene flame and the 442.7 nm wavelength line. Standard calcium solutions used for calibration contained weighed amounts of calcium carbonate (NIST SRM 915, dried at 250 [degrees]C for 2 h) and La[Cl.sub.3] in the concentration of about 4.08 mmol/L (about 1000 ppm). The calcium solutions were placed in volumetric flasks (Class A) having volume of 500 mL [+ or -] 0.2 mL (later assumed as a standard uncertainty). For experimental details see Refs. [4] and [10].

2.3.2 Phosphorus Content

Phosphorus was determined colorimetrically [11] as the phosphovanadomolybdate complex with a Cary Model 219 spectrometer using a wavelength of 420 nm. Standard phosphate solutions (flasks Class A with volume of 100 mL [+ or -] 0.08 mL) used for calibration contained weighed amounts of potassium dihydrogenphosphate (Baker Ultrex Reagent, dried at 105 [degrees]C for 2 h) and vanadomolybdate reagent. For experimental details see Refs. [4] and [10].

2.3.3 Hydrogenphosphate Content

The Gee and Deitz method [11] with some modifications [12] was used for determination of the content of phosphorus in the form of hydrogenphosphate (HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-]) in HA. The HA-SRM sample was heated at 550 [degrees]C in air for 24 h to convert the hydrogenphosphate into pyrophosphate ([P.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.4-]). One portion (A) of this heated sample ([approximately equal to]9 mg) was dissolved in 1 mol/L HCl[O.sub.4] (in 100 mL volumetric flask) and heated in a boiling water bath for 3 h to hydrolyze the whole content of [P.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.4-] into phosphate ions (P[O.sub.4.sup.3-]). Another portion (B) of heated HA-SRM ([approximately equal to]9 mg) was freshly dissolved at 25 [degrees]C just prior to phosphate analysis to minimize hydrolysis of [P.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.4-] to phosphates. The phosphorus concentrations were determined in both samples as described in Section 2.3.2. The difference in phosphorus contents between samples B and A corresponds to the content of [P.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.4-] in the heated HA-SRM and to the content of HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] in the unheated HA-SRM sample.

2.3.4 Water Content

The water content was determined from mass loss by three different procedures: (a) The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on five samples all in the temperature range from 30 [degrees]C to 850 [degrees]C (rate 10 [degrees]C/min) in a nitrogen atmosphere. (b) Six powdered samples (mass 200 mg to 500 mg) were heated at 850 [degrees]C in air at [approximately equal to]50% relative humidity for times ranging from 16 h to 20 h. The samples were weighed after cooling for 5 min in a desiccator at ambient conditions. (c) Three of the powdered samples were pressed into pellets and heated at 1000 [degrees]C in a steam atmosphere (100 kPa) for 10 h. These samples were weighed after cooling for 5 min in a desiccator.

2.3.5 Carbonate Content

The carbonate (C[O.sub.3.sup.2-]) content was determined by heating [approximately equal to]5 g of the HA-SRM sample at 1200 [degrees]C to liberate C[O.sub.2] that was collected in an absorption cell containing a lithium hydroxide solution. Carbonates in the absorption-cell were determined by automatic coulometric titration. These analyses were done by Galbraith Laboratories, Knoxville, TN.

2.3.6 Silicate and Trace Elements Content

The content of silicon and 63 other elements were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (IPS-MS) by Galbraith Laboratories, Knoxville, TN.

2.4 Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy

Transmission electron micrographs were obtained from crystals placed directly onto formvar- and carbon-coated nickel grids, or from crystals that were suspended in solution by brief sonication in pure ethanol. In the latter case, ethanol-suspended crystals were allowed to settle onto the support film after which the ethanol was extracted from the edges of the grid with filter paper. Ultrastructural images of the crystals were recorded by transmission electron microscopy at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV using a JEOL JEM 2000FX-II. The samples for scanning electron microscopy were coated with gold and examined with a scanning electron microscope JEOL 5300.

2.5 Surface Area

The surface area was determined by the triple-point BET (Brunauer, Emmett, Teller) method [13] with nitrogen as the adsorbate gas and helium as an inert non-adsorbable carrier. The mole fractions of nitrogen in [N.sub.2]/He flowing mixtures were 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3. The sample mass was about 200 mg.

2.6 Infrared Spectroscopy

IR transmission and second derivative spectra were recorded with a Perkin-Elmer Model 621 spectrometer and with a Nicolet Magna 550 spectrometer, respectively, from the HA-SRM powder suspended in KBr pellets.

2.6.1 IR Transmission Spectra

IR transmission spectra from 4000 c[m.sup.-1] to 300 c[m.sup.-1] were recorded at 48 [degrees]C (temperature in instrument light beam) with a Perkin-Elmer Model 621 spectrometer purged with dry C[O.sub.2]-free air. KBr sample pellets were run versus a blank KBr pellet in the reference beam to cancel KBr impurity bands, mainly [H.sub.2]O bands. KBr pellets were prepared by mixing (not grinding) the pre ground HA-SRM (0.8 mg and 4.0 mg; particle cluster size [less than or equal to]5 [micro]m composed of crystal sizes of 0.1 [micro]m to 0.5 [micro]m) with 400 mg of IR quality KBr (about 20 [micro]m to 40 [micro]m particle sizes). Grinding the sample and KBr together was avoided to reduce additional moisture adsorption from the ground and smaller KBr particles. The HA-SRM and KBr were mixed in a steel capsule on a mechanical shaker and then pressed in a 13 mm diameter evacuated die under a total force of 53,380 N (12 000 pound-force) for 30 s. One die face was machined nonparallel to the second die face, by about 1[degrees]. This nonparallel die face produced a wedge-shaped pellet, which reduced spectral interference fringes (especially important for second derivative spectra described below). Spectral slit widths were about 6 c[m.sup.-1] for wavenumbers above 2000 c[m.sup.-1] and 3 c[m.sup.-1] to 5 c[m.sup.-1] for wavenumbers below 2000 c[m.sup.-1]. The wavenumber standard uncertainty, calibrated against standard indene bands [14], was 1 c[m.sup.-1] for sharp bands and several c[m.sup.-1] for broad bands.

The ion charges for infrared and Raman bands of different ions are normally omitted in the text.

2.6.2 IR Second Derivative Spectra

Second derivative spectra of absorbance spectra for the [[nu].sub.3] and [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] bands were obtained in the ranges 1120 c[m.sup.-1] to 1000 c[m.sup.-1] and 670 c[m.sup.-1] to 530 c[m.sup.-1] with a Nicolet 550 Magna spectrometer purged with dry C[O.sub.2]-free air. The instrumental and data collection conditions were: deuterated triglycine sulfate detector at room temperature, KBr beam splitter, 1 c[m.sup.-1] resolution, 1000 scans, 0.12 c[m.sup.-1] data spacing, Happ-Genzel apodization, no smoothing of [[nu].sub.3] P[O.sub.4] absorbance spectrum, 25-point smoothing of [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] absorbance spectrum, and Nicolet Omnic software to obtain second derivative spectra of the absorbance spectra. High quality absorbance spectra without interference fringes and with low noise are required to obtain meaningful second derivative spectra. To help achieve this, the following were done: (1) to reduce interference fringes, wedge-shaped KBr pellets were prepared as described above (400 mg, 13 mm diameter with thickness increasing from 1.0 mm to about 1.2 mm across the pellet), (2) to eliminate the introduction of possible fringes in the background spectrum, the background for the sample was obtained from the empty pellet holder (no blank KBr pellet) in the spectrometer; and (3) to increase signal to noise, high sample concentrations and resultant high absorbance values of about 1.5 were used; the pellets contained 0.24 mg and 1.0 mg of HA-SRM for [[nu].sub.3] P[O.sub.4] and [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] spectra, respectively. KBr has no bands or impurity bands in the investigated regions. The second derivative wavenumber positions for the [[nu].sub.3] and [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] bands were determined with a standard uncertainty of 0.1 c[m.sup.-1].

2.7 Raman Spectroscopy

Raman spectra were recorded with a Spex Model 1401 spectrometer in the 4000 c[m.sup.-1] to 50 c[m.sup.-1] region using the 488.0 nm wavelength excitation from an argon ion laser and a power of 320 mW measured at the sample. Spectra were obtained from about 4 mg of sample powder that was tamped in a cylindrical well (2.5 mm diameter, 1 mm deep) in the center of an aluminum disk 1.5 mm thick and 13 mm in diameter followed by pressing under a sufficient force of about 71,170 N (16,000 pound-force) for 5 s to reduce disk thickness, constrict the sample well and compact the sample. The exciting radiation, upward and vertical, was focused on the compacted sample in the disk tilted about 30[degrees] from the incoming radiation direction. Scattered radiation was collected at 90[degrees] to the incoming beam direction and detected by a RCA C31034 photomultiplier cooled to -25[degrees]C.

The scattered radiation from the sample was passed through a 488.0 nm filter (2) placed ahead of the spectrometer entrance slit to reduce the intensity of the 488.0 nm exciting line that was reflected from the opaque sample. This filter markedly reduced the intensity of the 488.0 nm line (about [10.sup.-4]% of original); this enabled obtaining spectra to within about 50 c[m.sup.-1] of the exciting line and also eliminated spurious “grating ghost” bands.

The spectral slit width was 3.5 c[m.sup.-1]. The wavenumber standard uncertainty was [approximately equal to]0.5 c[m.sup.-1], based on calibration using standard neon emission lines [15] from a neon lamp.

The baseline (BL) was obtained by reflecting the 488.0 nm line from a piece of rough surface platinum foil placed in the normal sample position. One spurious band was observed in the BL at 468 c[m.sup.-1].

2.8 X-Ray Diffraction

The x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the powdered HA-SRM samples (about 150 mg in an aluminum holder) were obtained in the range of 3[degrees] 2[theta] to 70[degrees] 2[theta] with a Rigaku DMAX 2200 diffractometer operating at 40 kV and 40 mA, producing graphite-monochromatized CuK[alpha] radiation with wavelength [lambda] = 0.15405945 nm, and at a scan speed of 0.030[degrees] 2[theta]/min. The relative intensities were determined as diffraction line heights relative to the most intense line normalized to the intensity of 100, with the Materials Data, Inc., JADE 6.1 XRD Patterns Processing software (MDI JADE 6.1).

For determination of diffraction line positions (2[theta]-values), two samples were prepared by mixing HA-SRM with pre ground silicon (Silicon Powder 2[theta]/d-Spacing Standard, NIST SRM 640b) that served as an internal standard to correct 2[theta]-values of HA-SRM. The samples contained mass fractions of 88% HA-SRM and 12% silicon. Two separate scans with the speed of 0.012[degrees] 2[theta]/min were obtained for each sample. For each scan, the position of each HA-SRM and silicon diffraction line was determined with MDI JADE 6.1 as the average of four measurements using pseudo-Voigt and Pearson-VII profile functions (two measurements for each profile function).

The HA-SRM unitcell (lattice) parameters were calculated with the Least Squares Unit Cell Refinement and Indexing for Personal Computer (LSUCRIPC) program (3); the input data were 2[theta]-values and corresponding indices (hkl) of the eight diffraction lines in the range from 39[degrees] 2[theta] to 54[degrees] 2[theta], which have relative intensities above 10, and do not overlap with other HA-SRM and silicon diffraction lines. For each HA-SRM sample, the unit-cell parameters were calculated from the average 2[theta]-values determined from the two separate scans. The final HA-SRM unit-cell parameters are the average of the data for the two samples.

Diffraction theory predicts that the diffraction lines of a XRD powder pattern will be very sharp for a crystalline material consisting of sufficiently large and strain-free crystallites [16]; therefore, the XRD line broadening (peak width) inversely correlates with crystal size and lattice perfection. The term “crystallinity” is commonly used to represent the crystallite size and lattice perfection. For determination of diffraction line angular width at its half-height, the lines having hkl indices (200), (002), (102), (210), (310) and (004) were recorded earlier with a vertically mounted Rigaku Denki diffractometer system operating at 40 kV and 25 mA, producing graphitemonochromatized CuK[alpha] radiation with wavelength [lambda] = 0.15405945 nm (time constant 10, scale 500 counts/s, scan speed 0.03125[degrees] 2[theta]/min). The diffraction line angular width, B, at its half-height above background was measured with an optical magnifier and expressed in [degrees] 2[theta]. The angular width (B) was corrected for instrumental line broadening (b) caused by instrument imperfections [16]. The corrected value of the angular width ([beta]) expressed in [degrees] 2[theta], was calculated from Warren’s equation [16]

[beta] = ([[beta].sup.2] – [b.sup.2])[.sup.1/2].

A stoichiometric, highly crystalline monoclinic hydroxyapatite (hc-HA) prepared by solid-state thermal reaction [17] was used as a reference substance in determination of the value of b (the angular width at the half-height of hc-HA diffraction lines). The b-values for hc-HA diffraction lines were determined for the same six lines as for HA-SRM.

The reciprocal of the [beta] value (1/[beta]) correlates to the crystallite size/perfection [16].

2.9 Statistical Analysis

Uncertainties were assessed by the CIPM (International Committee for Weights and Measures) approach [18]. The uncertainty of a measurement result commonly consists of several components. An estimated standard deviation called a standard uncertainty, [u.sub.i], represents a component of uncertainty. A combined standard uncertainty, [u.sub.c], was computed by the method of propagation of uncertainties [18, 19] and represents at the level of one standard deviation the combined effects of all standard uncertainties, [u.sub.i]’s. According to the CIPM recommendation [18] the uncertainty of a measurement result is expressed with expanded uncertainty, U. Results in this paper, except as noted, are expressed as mean value [+ or -] U, where U = 2[u.sub.c].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Chemical Composition

3.1.1 Calcium

The mass fraction of calcium in HA-SRM varied from 38.78% to 39.49% with a mean value of 39.15% [+ or -] 0.10% (Table 1).

3.1.2 Phosphorus

The mass fraction of the total phosphorus content in HA-SRM varied from 18.111% to 18.235% with a mean value of 18.181% [+ or -] 0.037%.

3.1.3 Ca/P Molar Ratio

From the mean values of Ca and P contents the calculated Ca/P molar ratio was 1.664 [+ or -] 0.005. This value is in agreement with the ratio of 1.6649 [+ or -] 0.0005 independently determined for this HA-SRM by thermal-product analysis [6,8]. The Ca/P ratio of 1.664 for this HA-SRM is about 0.2% below the stoichiometric value of 1.6667.

3.1.4 Hydrogenphosphate and Phosphate

The mass fraction of phosphorus present in the form of hydrogenphosphate ions (HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-]) was 0.191% [+ or -] 0.010% and accordingly, the mass fraction of HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] was 0.592% [+ or -] 0.030% (Table 1). The mass fraction of phosphorus present in the form of phosphate ions (P[O.sub.4.sup.3-]) is the difference between mass fractions of the total phosphorus content (18.181% [+ or -] 0.037%) and of phosphorus present as HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] (0.191% [+ or -] 0.010%), giving the mass fraction of phosphorus present as P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] of 17.99% [+ or -] 0.05%. From this value the calculated mass fraction of P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] was 55.16% [+ or -] 0.15% (Table 1). The contents of P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] and HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] expressed as molar fractions of the total phosphate content were 98.95% and 1.05%, respectively.

3.1.5 Water

The total mass loss (expressed as the mass fraction) of samples heated continuously from 30 [degrees]C to 900 [degrees]C in a nitrogen atmosphere was 1.70% [+ or -] 0.05%. This mass loss is primarily attributed to water loss based on water band intensity changes in the IR spectrum of HA-SRM heated at 105 [degrees]C and 850 [degrees]C. The HA-SRM water content is the difference between the mass fractions of the total mass loss (1.70% [+ or -] 0.05%) and the water loss derived from hydrogenphosphate pyrolysis into pyrophosphate and thermal reaction of calcium pyrophosphate and HA forming [beta]-tricalcium phosphate; the calculated mass fraction of water derived from these thermal/chemical reactions was 0.111% [+ or -] 0.006%. Therefore, the mass fraction of water in HA-SRM was 1.59% [+ or -] 0.05% or 0.902 [H.sub.2]O molecule per HA-SRM unit cell (Table 1).

The TG-curve for HA-SRM (Fig. 1) is shown in the temperature range from 30 [degrees]C to 900 [degrees]C; on the left ordinate is mass fraction and on the right ordinate is the corresponding calculated number of water layers progressively removed from the HA-SRM surface. The number of water layers on the HA-SRM surface was calculated from the HA-SRM surface area of 18.3 [m.sup.2]/g (Section 3.2) and a cross-sectional area of 0.115 n[m.sup.2] for an adsorbed water molecule [20] on the HA surface; one monolayer of water corresponds to the mass fraction of 0.47%. Rootare and Craig [20] have carried out detailed studies of vapor phase adsorption of water on HA. They found that the water monolayer that is in contact with the HA surface (chemisorbed layer) was more strongly bound than the additional water layers (all physisorbed layers) that involved water/water contacts only. To completely remove the chemisorbed monolayer, heating at 300 [degrees]C in vacuum was required whereas the physisorbed layers could be removed at 20 [degrees]C in vacuum.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The TG-curve (Fig. 1) showed an initial mass loss (expressed as mass fraction) of [approximately equal to]0.4% in the temperature range from 30 [degrees]C to 100 [degrees]C and a mass loss of [approximately equal to]0.3% in the range from 100 [degrees]C to 250 [degrees]C. These two losses (mass fractions), giving a sum of [approximately equal to]0.7%, correspond to [approximately equal to]1.5 layers mainly of physisorbed water although some chemisorbed water is also expected to be lost between 100 [degrees]C and 250 [degrees]C [20]. Between 250 [degrees]C and 360 [degrees]C, a loss of [approximately equal to]0.55% was observed which corresponds to [approximately equal to]1 layer of chemisorbed water. This temperature range, 250 [degrees]C to 360 [degrees]C, and mass loss equivalent to [approximately equal to]1 water layer are consistent with data of Rootare and Craig [20] for the chemisorbed water layer. The mass fraction lost in the temperature range from 360 [degrees]C to 850 [degrees]C was [approximately equal to]0.45%. Of this [approximately equal to]0.45%, [approximately equal to]0.11% corresponds to water loss from HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-]/[P.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.4-]/HA/[beta]-TCP reactions, [approximately equal to]0.02% corresponds to loss from C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] decomposition on heating to 850 [degrees]C and the remainder of [approximately equal to]0.32% corresponds to [approximately equal to]0.7 layer of water that is more strongly held by the crystals than the chemisorbed layer.

From these TG-data it appeared that the total number of water layers at the surface of the HA-SRM crystals was [approximately equal to]2.5; [approximately equal to]1.5 layers correspond to physisorbed water and [approximately equal to]1 layer to chemisorbed water. The location of the more strongly-held water, equivalent to [approximately equal to]0.7 layer or about one water molecule per 5.6 HA-SRM unit cells is uncertain. It may be “structural” water or water trapped within crystals.

The mass fraction of water in HA-SRM determined from mass loss of powdered HA-SRM samples heated in air at 850 [degrees]C for 16 h to 20 h, then cooled in a desiccator and weighed in the laboratory atmosphere (50% relative humidity) at ambient temperature was 1.430% [+ or -] 0.034%, whereas the mass fraction of water in HA-SRM determined in samples pressed into pellets and heated in a steam atmosphere at 1000 [degrees]C for 10 h and then cooled and weighed as above was 1.564% [+ or -] 0.028%. In both cases the HA-SRM water content was lower than in the samples heated and weighed in the nitrogen atmosphere because of fast readsorption of surface water during cooling and weighing in the air atmosphere at ambient temperature.

3.1.6 Carbonate

Carbonate ions are a common impurity in HA. The mass fraction of carbonate found in HA-SRM was in the range from 0.029% to 0.033% with the mean value of 0.032% [+ or -] 0.002% (Table 1). This carbonate content corresponds to 0.00545 C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] ion per HA-SRM unit cell (Table 1) or to one C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] ion per 183 HA-SRM unit cells.

3.1.7 Silicate

The mass fraction of silicon of 0.015% (Table 2) expressed as mass fraction of silicate ions, Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-], was 0.0406% (Table 1). This content corresponds to 0.00546 Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] ion per HA-SRM unit cell or to one Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] ion per 183 HA-SRM unit cells. The source of the silicon impurity was most plausibly the boro-silicate glass apparatus used in preparation of HA-SRM.

3.1.8 Trace Constituents

Trace constituents with mass fractions above 0.0005% (>5 ppm) in HA-SRM are listed in Table 2 and summarized in Table 1. Approximately 0.001 atom each of Al, B, Mg, Na and Sr occurs per HA-SRM unit cell (Table 2), which corresponds to approximately one of each atom per 1000 unit cells. The sum of trace constituent atoms of 0.00595 per HA-SRM unit cell (Table 1) corresponds to one trace constituent atom per 168 HA-SRM unit cells.

3.1.9 Hydroxide

In Table 1 are listed the contents of analyzed HA-SRM constituents: calcium, phosphate, hydrogen-phosphate, water, carbonate, silicate and sum of trace constituents. From these contents the number of constituents per HA-SRM unit cell was calculated by normalizing the total number of phosphate groups (P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] and HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-]) to six, 5.937 P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] and 0.063 HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-]. The relative charge attributed to the total number of hydroxide ions (O[H.sup.-]) per unit cell was calculated from the difference between positive and negative relative charges of all unit-cell constituents; a mean value of -2.026 for O[H.sup.-] ions balanced the total charge to zero. This calculated number of 2.026 [+ or -] 0.070 of O[H.sup.-] ions per HA-SRM unit cell corresponds to the mass fraction of 3.37% [+ or -] 0.12% of O[H.sup.-] in HA-SRM (Table 1).

3.1.10 Sum of Mass Fractions

The total sum of mass fractions of all constituents was 99.95% [+ or -] 0.22% (Table 1); this shows high accuracy of the chemical analyses.

3.2 Crystal Morphology and Specific Surface Area

Transmission and scanning electron micrographs of the HA-SRM crystals are shown in Fig. 2. Generally, the crystals appear to have a cylindrical shape with heights of [approximately equal to]0.1 [micro]m to 0.3 [micro]m and diameters of [approximately equal to]0.05 [micro]m to 0.15 [micro]m. The specific surface area determined by BET was 17.7 [m.sup.2]/g to 19.1 [m.sup.2]/g with an average value of 18.3 [m.sup.2]/g [+ or -] 0.3 [m.sup.2]/g. This specific surface area for the HA-SRM crystals compares well with the value of 16.6 [m.sup.2]/g calculated by assuming an average cylindrical particle with height of 0.2 [micro]m and diameter of 0.1 [micro]m.

The HA sample of McDowell et al. prepared by precipitation from solutions had a specific surface area of 16.7 [m.sup.2]/g determined by BET [9]. This value of 16.7 [m.sup.2]/g is in agreement with the above value of 18.3 [m.sup.2]/g for HA-SRM. These data indicate the reproducibility of crystal sizes and surface area of HAs prepared by the same method.

3.3 Infrared Spectra

3.3.1 IR Transmittance Spectra

IR transmittance spectra of HA-SRM at two different concentrations (0.8 mg and 4.0 mg HA-SRM per 400 mg KBr) are shown in the 4000 c[m.sup.-1] to 300 c[m.sup.-1] range in Fig. 3. The spectra show the bands of HA along with additional bands that are ascribed to impurity ions (C[O.sub.3.sup.2-], HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-], and silicate ions), and associated [H.sub.2]O.

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Bands of HA [21]: (a) The bands at 3572 c[m.sup.-1], 631 c[m.sup.-1], and 342 c[m.sup.-1] arise from stretching, librational, and translational modes, respectively, of O[H.sup.-] ions. (b) The 1090 c[m.sup.-1] and about 1040 c[m.sup.-1] bands arise from [[nu].sub.3] P[O.sub.4], the 962 c[m.sup.-1] band arises from [[nu].sub.1] P[O.sub.4], the 601 c[m.sup.-1] and 574 c[m.sup.-1] bands arise from [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4], and the 472 c[m.sup.-1] band arises from [[nu].sub.2] P[O.sub.4]. (c) The group of weak intensity bands in the 2200 c[m.sup.-1] to 1950 c[m.sup.-1] region derives from overtones and combinations of the [[nu].sub.3] and [[nu].sub.1] P[O.sub.4] modes. The sharpness of bands, especially sharpness of the 631 c[m.sup.-1], 601 c[m.sup.-1], and 574 c[m.sup.-1] bands, indicate a well-crystallized HA.

Bands of C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] impurity ions: The weak intensity bands at about 1410 c[m.sup.-1] and 1450 c[m.sup.-1] in the spectrum of HA-SRM at high concentration (4.0 mg of HA-SRM per 400 mg KBr) are attributed to components of the [[nu].sub.3] mode of a trace amount of C[O.sub.3.sup.2-]. The mass fraction of C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] in HA-SRM determined by chemical analysis, Sec. 3.1.6, was 0.032%. The areas and intensities of these C[O.sub.3] bands correspond to mass fraction of about 0.03% C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] by comparison to C[O.sub.3] bands of other HA samples [6] containing chemically analyzed C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] mass fractions of about 0.3%; this band intensity agreement for this low C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] content helps identify these weak intensity bands as C[O.sub.3] bands. Bands of other C[O.sub.3] modes, [[nu].sub.4] and [[nu].sub.1], were not detected because of their weak intensities and the [[nu].sub.2] C[O.sub.3] band at about 872 c[m.sup.-1], with intensity about one fifth that of [[nu].sub.3] C[O.sub.3], is obscured by the HP[O.sub.4] band at 875 c[m.sup.-1]. The C[O.sub.3] bands at 1410 c[m.sup.-1] and 1450 c[m.sup.-1] derive from C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] (designated the “B-type” carbonate) that replace P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] ions in the HA lattice [22] (and references therein). Bands at 1455 c[m.sup.-1] and about 1540 c[m.sup.-1], which derive from C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] (designated the “A-type” carbonate) that replace O[H.sup.-] ions in the HA lattice [23], were not detected. The mass fraction of 0.032% chemically determined C[O.sub.3.sup.2-], corresponds to one C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] ion per 1101 total phosphate ions (P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] and HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-]).

Bands of HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] impurity ions: The band at 875 c[m.sup.-1] is attributed to arise from HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ions for several reasons [24,25]. Chemical analysis shows that HA-SRM contains 1.05 HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ions per 98.95 P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] ions (Sec. 3.1.4, Table 1) or molar fraction of 1.05% HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] with respect to the total P content. The isolated HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ion has 9 predicted infrared active internal modes for its highest symmetry point group, [C.sub.3v], and 12 predicted infrared active modes for its lowest symmetry point group, [C.sub.1]. At this very low molar fraction of 1.05% HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-], of the 9 to 12 possible bands, only the 875 c[m.sup.-1] band is clearly detectable; the other HP[O.sub.4] bands are obscured by the P[O.sub.4] bands of HA and, in addition, the (-O-H) bands of the HOP[O.sub.3.sup.2-] ions are broad and weak in intensity. The normalized intensity and area of the 875 c[m.sup.-1] band correlates with HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] content determined by chemical analysis. A HA sample containing a HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] molar fraction of 2.34% by chemical analysis [3,6] had a 875 c[m.sup.-1] normalized band area 2.1 times that of the HA-SRM that contained HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] molar fraction of 1.05% determined by chemical analysis. In addition, this 875 c[m.sup.-1] HP[O.sub.4] band was, as expected, missing in spectra of HA-SRM that had been heated at 550 [degrees]C because of condensation of HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ions to form [P.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.4-] ions and [H.sub.2]O.

[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]

Bands of silicate impurity ions: The mass fraction of Si in HA-SRM determined by chemical analyses was 0.015% (Sec. 3.1.7); the mass fraction calculated as the Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] was 0.0406% (Table 1). Previous work [6] on other HAs prepared by precipitation in glass apparatus from solution at 100 [degrees]C and high pH produced HAs that contained Si mass fraction of about 0.1% to 0.3% determined by chemical analyses. IR spectra of these HAs had weak bands, not deriving from HA, at 890 c[m.sup.-1], [approximately equal to]830 c[m.sup.-1], [approximately equal to]750 c[m.sup.-1] and [approximately equal to]500 c[m.sup.-1] and a Raman band at 890 c[m.sup.-1] whose intensities correlated with silicon content. Consequently, these bands were attributed to silicate ions, and their most probable source was the glass apparatus. The type of silicate ion Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] (chain or ring structures), [Si.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.6-], or Si[O.sub.4.sup.4-] in these HAs was not identified with certainty by IR or Raman methods primarily because of the low silicate contents and resultant weak band intensities along with interference from the strong HA bands. Nevertheless, the combined IR and Raman data and additional thermal data suggested that (Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-])[.sub.3] = [Si.sub.3][O.sub.9.sup.6-] ring and [Si.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.6-] ions may be present and Si[O.sub.4.sup.4-] and acidic silicates less probable. The high concentration spectrum of HA-SRM in Fig. 3 has very weak bands at 890 c[m.sup.-1] and [approximately equal to]750 c[m.sup.-1]; these two bands are better discerned in the high concentration spectrum of the heated HA-SRM that will be shown in the paper on monoclinic HA [8]. These 890 c[m.sup.-1] and 750 c[m.sup.-1] bands are attributed to silicate ions and are assumed to be Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] ions.

Bands of [H.sub.2]O molecules: The broad band from about 3700 c[m.sup.-1] to 2500 c[m.sup.-1] derives from the [[nu].sub.3] and [[nu].sub.1] stretching modes of hydrogen-bonded [H.sub.2]O molecules, and the band at 1630 c[m.sup.-1] derives from the [[nu].sub.2] bending mode of the [H.sub.2]O molecules. The thermogravimetric data in Table 1 show a mean mass loss (expressed as mass fraction) of 1.59% on heating HA-SRM that is primarily attributed to loss of adsorbed water. In the IR spectra of HA-SRM after heating at 850 [degrees]C [8], the above water bands are, as expected, missing; this indirectly identifies [H.sub.2]O as the principal component lost on heating.

3.3.2 IR Second Derivative Spectra

IR second derivative spectra of the [[nu].sub.3] and [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] bands are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5, respectively, and the second derivative band positions are given in Table 3. Second derivative spectra of the [[nu].sub.1] and [[nu].sub.2] P[O.sub.4] bands are not shown. Only one [[nu].sub.1] P[O.sub.4] band was detected at 962.9 c[m.sup.-1] in second derivative spectra and the instrument detector response, progressively lower in the 500 c[m.sup.-1] to 400 c[m.sup.-1] region along with the weak [[nu].sub.2] P[O.sub.4] band intensity, precluded obtaining well-resolved second derivative spectra of the [[nu].sub.2] P[O.sub.4] band although the bands occur at about 474 c[m.sup.-1] and 462 c[m.sup.-1]. Under 1 c[m.sup.-1] resolution, eleven [[nu].sub.3] P[O.sub.4] bands were resolved (Fig. 4). Two of these bands, numbered 3 and 4 in Fig. 4 and in Table 3, are attributed to arise from the mass fraction of about 25% of monoclinic HA; these bands will be discussed in the paper on monoclinic HA [8]. Thus, nine bands were detected for the [[nu].sub.3] P[O.sub.4] mode of this hexagonal HA-SRM. In Fig. 5, five second derivative [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] bands were detected; the absorbance band and second derivative band at 633 c[m.sup.-1] derive from the O[H.sup.-] librational mode.

[FIGURE 4 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]

3.4 Raman Spectra

Raman spectra of HA-SRM in the range from 4000 c[m.sup.-1] to 50 c[m.sup.-1] recorded with relative intensities of 1 and 10 in the range below 1200 c[m.sup.-1] and with relative intensity of 3.3 in the range above 1200 c[m.sup.-1] are shown in Fig. 6. The spectra have the bands of hexagonal HA and two additional bands that arise from HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] impurity ions. Under the spectral resolution used (spectral slit width of 3.5 c[m.sup.-1]), no bands of monoclinic HA are resolved.

Bands of HA [26-29]: (a) The 3573 c[m.sup.-1] and 329 c[m.sup.-1] bands arise from stretching and translational modes of the O[H.sup.-] ions, respectively; the O[H.sup.-] librational bands expected in the 630 c[m.sup.-1] region are not clearly detected although two bands are predicted by [C.sub.6] factor group symmetry analysis [21]. (b) The 1076 c[m.sup.-1], 1052 c[m.sup.-1] (shoulder, sh), 1047 c[m.sup.-1], 1040 c[m.sup.-1] (sh), and 1028.5 c[m.sup.-1] bands arise from [[nu].sub.3] P[O.sub.4], the very strong 962 c[m.sup.-1] band arises from [[nu].sub.1] P[O.sub.4], the 614 c[m.sup.-1], 607 c[m.sup.-1], 590 c[m.sup.-1], and 579 c[m.sup.-1] bands arise from [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4], and the 447 c[m.sup.-1] and 431 c[m.sup.-1] bands arise from [[nu].sub.2] P[O.sub.4]. (c) The group of weak intensity bands in the 329 c[m.sup.-1] to 50 c[m.sup.-1] region derives from translations of the [Ca.sup.2+], P[O.sub.4.sup.3-], and O[H.sup.-] ions and librations of the P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] ions. The 329 c[m.sup.-1], 305 c[m.sup.-1], and 270 c[m.sup.-1] bands have been assigned to vibrations of the 2[([Ca.sub.II])[.sub.3]-(OH)] sublattice of hexagonal HA, and the band at 285 c[m.sup.-1] primarily to libratory phosphate motions [28,30].

Bands of C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] impurity ions: The strongest intensity C[O.sub.3] band, [[nu].sub.1], for the B-type C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] impurity occurs at 1070 c[m.sup.-1]; this band is obscured by the strong intensity P[O.sub.4] band at 1076 c[m.sup.-1]. The other C[O.sub.3] modes [[nu].sub.3], [[nu].sub.4], and [[nu].sub.2] ([[nu].sub.2] is expected to be Raman active because of low symmetry of C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] ion) have band positions not obscured by the P[O.sub.4] bands, but they have weak intensities and were not detected. The [[nu].sub.1] C[O.sub.3] band for A-type C[O.sub.3.sup.2-], unobscured by P[O.sub.4] bands, occurs at 1106 c[m.sup.-1] [31], and is useful for detecting the A-type C[O.sub.3.sup.2-]. However, this band was absent; this was expected because the IR spectra did not have bands for the A-type C[O.sub.3.sup.2-].

[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]

Bands of HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] impurity ions: The weak band at 1005 c[m.sup.-1] is assigned to symmetric stretching of the HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ions and the weak band at 880 c[m.sup.-1] to [P-(OH)] stretching of the HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ions [6,32]. Similarly as in IR spectra, these two Raman bands increase in intensity with an increase in HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] content, and they are missing in spectra of HA-SRM that had been heated at 550 [degrees]C because of thermal conversion of HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ions to [P.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.4-] ions. This independent detection of HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ions in Raman spectra confirms the IR data on HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] ions.

Bands of silicate impurity ions: Bands of the trace silicate impurity, probably present as Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] or [Si.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.6-] ions, were not detected because of the low silicate mass fractions (about 0.04% as Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] or [Si.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.6-] ions). The mass fraction of 0.2% of silicate impurity (as [Si.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.6-]) was detectable in other HA preparations by the 890 c[m.sup.-1] band arising from [Si.sub.2][O.sub.7.sup.6-] ions.

Bands of [H.sub.2]O molecules: Water vibrational modes give rise to weak intensity stretching and bending bands in Raman spectra. The water component in HA-SRM (mass fraction of 1.59%) causes IR bands at 3700 c[m.sup.-1] to 2500 c[m.sup.-1] and 1630 c[m.sup.-1]; these water bands, expected at about the same wavenumbers in Raman spectra, were not observed in Raman spectra under the spectral intensity expansion used in Fig. 6.

3.5 Combined Infrared and Raman Data

A rigorous comparison of the number and coincidences of the IR and Raman bands cannot be made with the present data because equivalent high-resolution second derivative Raman spectra were not obtained for HA-SRM. Although additional Raman bands may be detected, comparisons of the predicted and observed current data are meaningful and are given in Table 4. IR and Raman bands that have wavenumber positions within 2 c[m.sup.-1] were considered coincident.

The number and coincidence or noncoincidence of the infrared and Raman active bands predicted according to factor group analysis for the [[nu].sub.1], [[nu].sub.2], [[nu].sub.3], and [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] modes of HA having hexagonal structures (P[6.sub.3]/m, [C.sub.6h]) and (P[6.sub.3], [C.sub.6]) [21] are given in Table 4 along with the observed number and coincidence or noncoincidence of the infrared and Raman bands of HA-SRM. Hexagonal HA belongs to the space group P[6.sub.3]; if, however, the O[H.sup.-] ions are disregarded, the overall structure is P[6.sub.3]/m. The lower P[6.sub.3] symmetry results from the position, heteronuclearity, and order of the O[H.sup.-] ions. In fluoroapatite (P[6.sub.3]/m space group), the F ions are located along the c-axis on the mirror planes passing through the [Ca.sub.II] triangles, whereas in hexagonal HA, the O[H.sup.-] ions, with internuclear axes coincident with the c-axis, are displaced about 0.03 nm from the planes of the [Ca.sub.II] triangles with protons pointing away from the [Ca.sub.II] triangles [33]; thus, the mirror planes passing through the [Ca.sub.II] triangles are lost and the P[6.sub.3] space group results. These minor structural differences cause considerable differences in the vibrational selection rules.

A comparison of the predicted and observed spectral data for the P[O.sub.4] modes in Table 4 shows a better fit with [C.sub.6h] than with [C.sub.6] symmetry. Weights of 1, 2, 3, and 3 were applied to data for the [[nu].sub.1], [[nu].sub.2], [[nu].sub.3], and [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] modes, respectively; these numerical weights correspond to the degeneracy of each mode. About 74% of the total spectral data for the P[O.sub.4] modes (the total number of IR and Raman bands and the number of coincident/noncoincident bands) better fit with [C.sub.6h] symmetry. About 26% of the total spectral data for the P[O.sub.4] modes (the total number of IR bands for the [[nu].sub.3] and [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] modes, the coincidence of the [[nu].sub.1] IR and Raman P[O.sub.4] bands, and the coincidence/noncoincidence of the [[nu].sub.3] Raman bands) better fit with [C.sub.6] symmetry. This better agreement with [C.sub.6h] symmetry is in accordance with previous conclusions based on fewer spectroscopic data [21,26] that also favored [C.sub.6h] symmetry (P[6.sub.3]/m space group) for hexagonal HA.

The number of observed IR [[nu].sub.3] and [[nu].sub.4] P[O.sub.4] bands is larger than predicted for [C.sub.6h] symmetry. This is believed to derive from sources other than effects of lower P[6.sub.3] symmetry, and this will be considered in a separate paper [34].

3.6 X-Ray Diffraction Pattern

The XRD pattern of HA-SRM is shown in Fig. 7. The observed positions of diffraction lines (2[theta] and corresponding [d.sub.2[theta]]) and their relative intensities ([I.sub.rel]) are listed in Table 5. These [d.sub.2[theta]] and [I.sub.rel] for HA-SRM are in full agreement with the corresponding values reported for hexagonal HA (JCPDS, Card No. 9-432) [35]. The additional weak lines of monoclinic HA that have relative intensities less than 1% of the strongest hexagonal HA line were not observed at the intensity scale shown in Fig. 7. The additional XRD measurements, from which a mass fraction of about 25% of monoclinic HA was determined in HA-SRM, will be reported in a separate paper [8].

[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]

3.7 Unit-Cell Parameters

The a and c unit-cell parameters for HA-SRM calculated from the eight selected diffraction lines (2[theta]-values marked with a in Table 5) are listed in Table 6. The complete set of d-values ([d.sub.calc]) calculated from these unitcell parameters is listed in Table 5. These [d.sub.calc]-values are in excellent agreement with [d.sub.2[theta]]-values determined from the 2[theta]-values that were not used for unitcell parameters calculation (2[theta]-values without asterisks in Table 5).

The a and c unit-cell parameters for HA-SRM determined in this paper are in very good agreement with the parameters determined for the same material by the Rietveld analyses [5,36], given in Table 6. The average values of these two independently determined unit-cell parameters for HA-SRM by the Rietveld analyses are: a = 0.94235 nm, and c = 0.68852 nm. As compared with these average unit-cell parameters, the values determined in this paper are 0.003% larger in a, and 0.003% larger in c than the corresponding average values. The values for similarly prepared hexagonal HA [9] determined by the Rietveld analyses [37] (Table 6, HA-McDowell) are 0.065% smaller in a, and 0.001% larger in c than the corresponding average values for HA-SRM determined by the Rietveld analyses.

3.8 Crystallinity

The mean angular widths at half-height (denoted as B and b) for the (200), (002), (102), (210), (310), and (004) diffraction lines of HA-SRM (B-values) and of hc-HA (b-values) and the calculated 1/[beta] values are listed in Table 7. The 1/[beta] values were determined in the next crystal directions: (i) along the a-axis perpendicular to b-c plane, 1/[beta] (200) = 6.0 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] [+ or -] 0.3 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1], (ii) along the c-axis perpendicular to a-b plane, 1/[beta] (002) = 8.4 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] [+ or -] 0.2 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] and 1/[beta](004) = 7.1 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] [+ or -] 0.3 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1], (iii) perpendicular to c-axis, 1/[beta] (210) = 5.8 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] [+ or -] 0.2 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] and 1/[beta] (310) = 5.5 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] [+ or -] 0.2 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] and (iv) perpendicular to b-axis, 1/[beta] (102) = 8.2 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1] [+ or -] 0.4 ([degrees] 2[theta])[.sup.-1]. The bigger 1/[beta] value denotes the larger crystal size and lattice perfection in corresponding crystal directions showing for HA-SRM the biggest 1/[beta] values for size/strain in directions along c-axis and that perpendicular to b-axis, and the smallest 1/[beta] values for size/strain in directions along a-axis and those perpendicular to c-axis. The 1/[beta] (002) for HA-SRM is [approximately equal to]10% smaller and 1/[beta] (310) for HA-SRM is [approximately equal to]40% larger than corresponding values for HA prepared by DCPA hydrolysis at pH [approximately equal to]6.5 [38]. For HA-SRM the ratio of 1/[beta] (002) and 1/[beta] (310) values, R(1/[beta]) = [1/[beta] (002)]/[1/[beta] (310)] = [beta] (310)/[beta] (002), is 1.6 and for HA hydrolyzed from DCPA at pH [approximately equal to]6.5 the ratio R(1/[beta]) is 2.5 [38]. These R(1/[beta])-values can be correlated with the ratio of crystal height (longer dimension) and crystal width (shorter dimension) of these HA crystals determined microscopically. HA-SRM crystals for which R(1/[beta]) = 1.6 have cylindrical shape with the height/diameter ratio of [approximately equal to]2 (Fig. 2), and HA crystals hydrolyzed from DCPA, for which R(1/[beta]) = 2.5, have plate-like shape with very large height/width ratio of [approximately equal to]10 [38]. It indicates that the c-axis of these HA crystals is in the direction along the crystal height and the a-axis is in the direction along the crystal width.

3.9 Solubility

The solubility product of this HA-SRM was previously determined [4]. The saturated solutions with respect to HA-SRM were obtained by dissolution of HA-SRM crystals in aqueous solutions of phosphoric acid for 60 d at 37.0 [degrees]C [+ or -] 0.1 [degrees]C. The thermodynamic solubility product, [K.sub.sp], of HA-SRM defined as [K.sub.sp](HA) = [a.sup.5]([Ca.sup.2+]) [a.sup.3](P[O.sub.4.sup.3-]) a(O[H.sup.-]), where a denotes ion activity, was calculated from measured equilibrium calcium and phosphate concentrations and pH values as input data. The mean value and standard uncertainty, [u.sub.i], of the twelve replicate determinations (n = 12) was [K.sub.sp](HA) = (2.03 [+ or -] 0.04) X [10.sup.-59]. The standard uncertainties, [u.sub.i](y), derived from other sources were also determined. These other sources were uncertainties in measurements of Ca, P and pH, and uncertainties in dissociation constants of phosphoric acid ([K.sub.1], [K.sub.2], and [K.sub.3]) and stability constant of calcium phosphate complexes used for [K.sub.sp] calculation. The major contributions to the combined uncertainty, [u.sub.c] = 0.356 X [10.sup.-59], were from pH measurements ([u.sub.i] = 0.196) and the [K.sub.3] literature value ([u.sub.i] = 0.280). The expanded uncertainty, U = 2[u.sub.c], was 0.71 X [10.sup.-59]; thus, the thermodynamic [K.sub.sp](HA) at 37 [degrees]C, expressed as the mean [+ or -]U, was (2.03 [+ or -] 0.71) X [10.sup.-59] and its p[K.sub.sp](HA) was 58.69 [+ or -] 0.15. This [K.sub.sp](HA) value of (2.03 [+ or -] 0.71) X [10.sup.-59] is in very good agreement with the literature value of (2.36 [+ or -] 0.28) X [10.sup.-59] determined under similar conditions for similarly prepared HA [9].

4. Conclusions

The chemical and physical analyses of this HA-SRM are considered very reliable based on the consistency of the combined results. This HA-SRM has application as a standard of numerous well established chemical and physical properties to compare with and to establish the validity of equivalent analyses on natural and synthetic hydroxyapatites, the mineral phases in calcified tissues, and in testing and regulation.

Table 1. Chemical composition of calcium hydroxyapatite standard

reference material (HA-SRM) along with the calculated number and total

relative charge of constituent ions per HA-SRM unit cell (a)

Constituent Mass fraction (%) n (b)

[Ca.sup.2+] 39.15 [+ or -] 0.10 20

P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] 55.16 [+ or -] 0.15 20

HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] 0.592 [+ or -] 0.030 4

[H.sub.2]O 1.59 [+ or -] 0.05 5

C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] 0.032 [+ or -] 0.002 12

Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] 0.0406 (e) 1

Trace elements (f) 0.0181 (f) 1

O[H.sup.-] 3.37 (h) [+ or -] 0.12

Sum 99.95 [+ or -] 0.22

Number of constituent Total relative charge of

ions/HA-SRM unit constituent ions/HA-SRM

Constituent cell (c) unit cell (d)

[Ca.sup.2+] 9.985 [+ or -] 0.026 +19.970 [+ or -] 0.051

P[O.sub.4.sup.3-] 5.937 [+ or -] 0.016 -17.811 [+ or -] 0.048

HP[O.sub.4.sup.2-] 0.063 [+ or -] 0.003 -0.126 [+ or -] 0.006

[H.sub.2]O 0.902 [+ or -] 0.028 0

C[O.sub.3.sup.2-] 0.00545 [+ or -] 0.00034 -0.0109 [+ or -] 0.0007

Si[O.sub.3.sup.2-] 0.00546 -0.0109

Trace elements (f) 0.00595 (f) +0.0144

O[H.sup.-] 2.026 (h) [+ or -] 0.070 -2.026 (g) [+ or -] 0.070

Sum 0

(a) All results expressed as mean value [+ or -]U, where U is expanded

uncertainty.

(b) Number of replicate measurements.

(c) Number of constituent ions normalized to six phosphate groups (5.937

P[O.sub.4] + 0.063 HP[O.sub.4]).

(d) Calculated from relative electrical charge of the constituent ion

time number of the constituent ions.

(e) Calculated from silicon content in Table 2.

(f) From Table 2.

(g) Calculated to balance total charge to 0.

(h) Derived from calculated relative charge of -2.026 (g).

Table 2. Contents of trace constituents (a) and silicon in HA-SRM

Mass Number of

Trace fraction ions/HA-SRM

constituent (%) unit cell (b)

[Al.sup.3+] 0.0029 0.00110

[Ba.sup.2+] 0.0024 0.00018

[B.sup.3+] 0.0015 0.00142

[Mg.sup.2+] 0.0029 0.00122

[Na.sup.+] 0.0031 0.00138

[Sr.sup.2+] 0.0044 0.00051

[Zn.sup.2+] 0.0009 0.00014

Sum 0.0181 0.00595

Si 0.0150 0.00546

(a) Trace constituents having mass fraction >0.0005% are included.

(b) Calculated number of ions per unit-cell.

Table 3. IR wavenumber positions of [[nu].sub.3] and [[nu].sub.4]

P[O.sub.4] bands of HA-SRM obtained from second derivative spectra

P[O.sub.4] bands (c[m.sup.-1])

Band number (a) [[nu].sub.3] [[nu].sub.4]

1 1027.0 565.1

2 1033.7 575.3

3 1036.0 (b) 586.4

4 1038.7 (b) 601.8

5 1043.6 605.4

6

7 1054.0

8 1065.4

9 1073.9

10 1081.3

11 1087.7

12 1097.5

(a) Refer to Figs. 4 and 5.

(b) These two bands are attributed to arise from monoclinic HA (mass

fraction [approximately equal to]25%).

Table 4. Predicted number and coincidence or noncoincidence of infrared

and Raman [[nu].sub.1], [[nu].sub.2], [[nu].sub.3], and [[nu].sub.4]

bands for P[O.sub.4] modes of hexagonal structures (P[6.sub.3]/m,

[C.sub.6h]) and (P[6.sub.3], [C.sub.6]) of calcium hydroxyapatite (a)

and observed bands for HA-SRM

Hexagonal P[O.sub.4] modes

structure Spectra [[nu].sub.1] [[nu].sub.2]

P[6.sub.3]/m, IR predicted 1nc 2nc

[C.sub.6h] R predicted 2nc 3nc

P[6.sub.3], IR predicted 2c 4c

[C.sub.6] R predicted 1nc, 2c 2nc, 4c

HA-SRM IR observed 1c 2nc

R observed 1c 2nc

Hexagonal P[O.sub.4] modes

structure Spectra [[nu].sub.3] [[nu].sub.4]

P[6.sub.3]/m, IR predicted 3nc 3nc

[C.sub.6h] R predicted 5nc 5nc

P[6.sub.3], IR predicted 6c 6c

[C.sub.6] R predicted 3nc, 6c 3nc, 6c

HA-SRM IR observed 7nc, 2c 4nc, 1c

R observed 3nc, 2c 3nc, 1c

(a) Predicted from Ref. 21.

IR = infrared.

R = Raman.

c = coincident.

nc = noncoincident.

Table 5. 2[theta]-values and relative intensities ([I.sub.rel]) observed

from the XRD pattern of HA-SRM, d-values determined from 2[theta]-values

([d.sub.2[theta]]), d-values calculated from unit cell parameters

([d.sub.calc]), and corresponding indices (hkl)

2[theta]([degrees]) [d.sub.2[theta]](nm) [d.sub.calc](nm) [I.sub.rel]

10.85 0.815 0.816 8

16.87 0.525 0.526 3

18.84 0.471 0.471 2

21.75 0.408 0.408 6

22.84 0.389 0.389 6

25.35 0.351 0.351 2

25.86 0.344 0.344 36

28.11 0.317 0.317 8

28.92 0.308 0.308 16

31.77 0.281 0.281 100

32.18 0.278 0.278 47

32.90 0.272 0.272 65

34.04 0.263 0.263 22

35.44 0.253 0.253 5

39.18 0.2297 0.2297 6

39.793* 0.2263 0.2263 22

40.43 0.2229 0.2229 1

41.98 0.2150 0.2150 6

42.30 0.2135 0.2134 1

43.84 0.2063 0.2063 4

44.36 0.2040 0.2040 1

45.29 0.2000 0.2000 4

46.683* 0.1944 0.1944 28

48.068* 0.1891 0.1891 12

48.58 0.1872 0.1872 3

49.458* 0.1841 0.1841 30

50.474* 0.1807 0.1807 15

51.254* 0.1781 0.1781 11

52.061* 0.1755 0.1755 11

53.167* 0.1721 0.1721 14

54.43 0.1684 0.1684 1

55.85 0.1645 0.1645 6

57.11 0.1611 0.1611 4

58.03 0.1588 0.1588 2

58.28 0.1582 0.1582 2

58.74 0.1570 0.1570 1

59.93 0.1542 0.1542 4

2[theta]([degrees]) hkl

10.85 100

16.87 101

18.84 110

21.75 200

22.84 111

25.35 201

25.86 002

28.11 102

28.92 210

31.77 211

32.18 112

32.90 300

34.04 202

35.44 301

39.18 212

39.793* 310

40.43 221

41.98 311

42.30 302

43.84 113

44.36 400

45.29 203

46.683* 222

48.068* 312

48.58 320

49.458* 213

50.474* 321

51.254* 410

52.061* 402

53.167* 004

54.43 104

55.85 322

57.11 313

58.03 501

58.28 412

58.74 330

59.93 420

* 2[theta]-values have expanded uncertainty (U) of

[+ or -]0.004[degrees] 2[theta] (n = 4).

Table 6. Unit-cell parameters for HA-SRM and similarly prepared HA by

McDowell et al. [9]

Sample a(nm) c(nm)

HA-SRM 0.94238 [+ or -] 0.00009 (a) 0.68854 [+ or -] 0.00006 (a)

HA-SRM 0.942253 [+ or -] 0.000013 (a) 0.688501 [+ or -] 0.000009 (a)

HA-SRM 0.94244 [+ or -] 0.00002 (b) 0.68854 [+ or -] 0.00002 (b)

HA-

McDowell 0.94174 [+ or -] 0.00002 (b) 0.68853 [+ or -] 0.00002 (b)

Sample XRD analysis Reference

HA-SRM Standard This paper

HA-SRM Rietveld [5]

HA-SRM Rietveld [36]

HA-

McDowell Rietveld [37]

(a) Mean value [+ or -] expanded uncertainty (U).

(b) Mean value [+ or -] standard deviation.

Table 7. The line width at half-height (B-value) for selected XRD lines

of HA-SRM, the corresponding line width at half-height (b-value) of hc-

HA (a), and calculated 1/[beta] values

1/[beta]([degrees]

hkl B([degrees] 2[theta]) b([degrees] 2[theta]) 2[theta])[.sup.-1]

200 0.225 [+ or -] 0.007 0.150 [+ or -] 0.002 6.0 [+ or -] 0.3

002 0.188 [+ or -] 0.002 0.145 [+ or -] 0.002 8.4 [+ or -] 0.2

102 0.183 [+ or -] 0.005 0.136 [+ or -] 0.004 8.2 [+ or -] 0.4

210 0.218 [+ or -] 0.003 0.134 [+ or -] 0.003 5.8 [+ or -] 0.2

310 0.218 [+ or -] 0.004 0.120 [+ or -] 0.004 5.5 [+ or -] 0.2

004 0.181 [+ or -] 0.005 0.114 [+ or -] 0.003 7.1 [+ or -] 0.3

(a) Highly crystalline HA prepared by solid state thermal reaction [17].

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the ADAF, the FDA, NIST, and the NIH/NIDCR Grant DE11789. We thank R. G. Garvey, North Dakota State University, for the LSUCRIPC program, M. D. McKee, University of Toronto, for transmission electron micrographs of the crystals, and W. E. Roberts, NIST, for thermogravimetric analyses.

Accepted: November 11, 2004

Available online: http://www.nist.gov/jres

(1) Certain commercial equipment, instruments or materials are identified in this paper to foster understanding. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Institutes of Health, or the ADA Foundation nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

(2) Holographic Notch Plus Filter, Kaiser Optical Systems, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI 48103.

(3) Least Squares Unit Cell Refinement, NDSU version Fargo 90.10.13.em after Appleman and Evans (1973), implementation by Roy G. Garvey, Department of Chemistry, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5516.

5. References

[1] R. Z. LeGeros, Calcium Phosphates in Oral Biology, Karger, Basel (1991).

[2] J. C. Elliott, Structure and Chemistry of the Apatites and Other Calcium Orthophosphates, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1994).

[3] J. Arends, J. Christoffersen, M. R. Christoffersen, H. Eckert, B. O. Fowler, J. C. Heughebaert, G. H. Nancollas, J. P. Yesinowski, and S. J. Zawacki, A Calcium Hydroxyapatite Precipitated from an Aqueous Solution. An International Multimethod Analysis, J. Crystal Growth 84, 515-532 (1987).

[4] M. Markovic, B. O. Fowler, M. S. Tung, and E. S. Lagergren, Composition and Solubility Product of a Synthetic Calcium Hydroxyapatite. Chemical and Thermal Determination of Ca/P Ratio and Statistical Analysis of Chemical and Solubility Data, In: Mineral and Scale Formation, Proc. of ACS Symposium, Z. Amjad, ed., Plenum, New York (1995) pp. 271-282.

[5] Certificate of Analysis, Standard Reference Material 2910, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (1997).

[6] B. O. Fowler, unpublished data.

[7] J. C. Elliott and P. E. Mackie, Monoclinic Hydroxyapatite, In: Physico-chimie et Cristallographie des Apatites d’Interet Biologique–No 230, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (C.N.R.S.), Paris, 69-76 (1975).

[8] M. Markovic, B. O. Fowler, and M. S. Tung, Preparation and Characterization of Monoclinic Calcium Hydroxyapatite, in preparation.

[9] H. McDowell, T. M. Gregory, and W. E. Brown, Solubility of [Ca.sub.5](P[O.sub.4])[.sub.3]OH in the System Ca(OH)[.sub.2]-[H.sub.3]P[O.sub.4]-[H.sub.2]O at 5, 15, 25 and 37 [degrees]C, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) 81A, 273-281 (1977).

[10] M. Markovic, B. O. Fowler, and W. E. Brown, Octacalcium Phosphate Carboxylates. 2. Characterization and Structural Considerations, Chem. Mater. 5, 1406-1416 (1993).

[11] A. Gee and V. R. Deitz, Determination of Phosphate by Differential Spectrophotometry, Anal. Chem. 25, 1320-1324 (1953).

[12] A. Gee and V. R. Deitz, Pyrophosphate Formation upon Ignition of Precipitated Basic Calcium Phosphates, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 2961-2965 (1955).

[13] S. Brunauer, P. H. Emmett, and E. Teller, Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 309-319 (1938).

[14] R. N. Jones and A. Nadeau, Further Observations on the Use of Indene for the Wavenumber Calibration of Infrared Spectrometers, Spectrochim. Acta 20, 1175-1183 (1964).

[15] J. Loader, Chap. 3 in Basic Laser Raman Spectroscopy, Heyden, London (1970).

[16] H. P. Klug and L. E. Alexander, X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York (1974) pp. 618-708.

[17] B. O. Fowler, Infrared Studies of Apatites. II. Preparation of Normal and Isotopically Substituted Calcium, Strontium, and Barium Hydroxyapatites and Spectrastructurecomposition Correlations, Inorg. Chem. 13, 207-214 (1974).

[18] Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ISBN 92-67-10188-9, 1st Ed., ISO, Switzerland (1993).

[19] H. H. Ku, Notes on the Propagation of Error Formulas, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. (U.S.) 70C, 263-273 (1966).

[20] H. M. Rootare and R. G. Craig, Vapor Phase Adsorption of Water on Hydroxyapatite, J. Dent. Res. 56(12), 1437-1488 (1977).

[21] B. O. Fowler, Infrared Studies of Apatites. I Vibrational Assignments for Calcium, Strontium, and Barium Hydroxyapatites Utilizing Isotopic Substitution, Inorg. Chem. 13, 194-207 (1974).

[22] D. W. Holcomb and R. A. Young, Thermal Decomposition of Human Tooth Enamel, Calcif. Tissue Int. 31, 189-201 (1980).

[23] J. C. Elliott, The Crystallographic Structure of Dental Enamel and Related Apatites, PhD. Thesis, University of London (1974).

[24] E. E. Berry, The Structure and Composition of Some Calcium-deficient Apatites, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 29, 317-327 (1967).

[25] S. J. Joris and C. H. Amberg, The Nature of Deficiency in Nonstoichiometric Hydroxyapatites. II. Spectroscopic Studies of Calcium and Strontium Hydroxyapatites, J. Phys. Chem. 75(20), 3172-3178 (1971).

[26] K. C. Blakeslee and R. A. Condrate, Sr., Vibrational Spectra of Hydrothermally Prepared Hydroxyapatites, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 54(11), 559-563 (1971).

[27] D. C. O’Shea, M. L. Bartlett, and R. A. Young, Compositional Analysis of Apatites with Laser-Raman Spectroscopy: (OH, F, Cl) Apatites, Archs. Oral Biol. 19, 995-1006 (1974).

[28] B. O. Fowler, Raman and Infrared Vibrational Spectra of Apatites, Mineralized Tissue Research Communications 1, Abstract No. 129 (1975). (Copy available from B. O. Fowler).

[29] D. G. A. Nelson and B. E. Williamson, Low-temperature Laser Raman Spectroscopy of Synthetic Carbonated Apatites and Dental Enamel, Austral. J. Chem. 35, 715-727 (1982).

[30] B. O. Fowler, Polarized Raman Spectra of Apatites, J. Dent. Res. 56, Abstract No. 68 (1977).

[31] B. O. Fowler, I. Polarized Raman Spectra of Apatites. II. Raman Bands of Carbonate Ions in Human Tooth Enamel, Mineralized Tissue Research Communications 3, Abstract No. 68 (1977). (Copy available from B. O. Fowler).

[32] B. O. Fowler, M. Markovic, and W. E. Brown, Octacalcium Phosphate. 3. Infrared and Raman Vibrational Spectra, Chem. Mater. 5, 1417-1423 (1993).

[33] M. I. Kay, R. A. Young, and A. S. Posner, Crystal Structure of Hydroxyapatite, Nature 204, 1050-1052 (1964).

[34] B. O. Fowler, Second Derivative Vibrational Spectra of Fluoroapatite and Hexagonal and Monoclinic Hydroxyapatite, in preparation.

[35] Powder Diffraction File: Inorganic Phases, Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards, Swarthmore (1986) Card No. 9-432.

[36] H. Morgan, R. M. Wilson, J. C. Elliott, S. E. P. Dowker, and P. Anderson, Preparation and Characterization of Monoclinic Hydroxyapatite and its Precipitated Carbonate Apatite Intermediate, Biomaterials 21, 617-627 (2000).

[37] R. A. Young and D. W. Holcomb, Variability of Hydroxyapatite Preparations, Calcif. Tissue Int. 34, 517-532 (1982).

[38] K. Ishikawa and E. D. Eanes, The Hydrolysis of Anhydrous Dicalcium Phosphate into Hydroxyapatite, J. Dent. Res. 72(2), 474-480 (1993).

Milenko Markovic

American Dental Association Foundation, Paffenbarger Research Center, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

Bruce O. Fowler

National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, NIH, Craniofacial and Skeletal Diseases Branch Research Associate Program at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

and

Ming S. Tung

American Dental Association Foundation, Paffenbarger Research Center, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

About the authors: Milenko Markovic and Ming S. Tung are PhD chemists with the American Dental Association Foundation in the Paffenbarger Research Center at NIST, and Bruce O. Fowler was a research chemist with the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research’s Research Associate Program in the Dental and Medical Materials Group, Polymers Division, Material Science and Engineering Laboratory at NIST and is now a guest researcher in the Polymers Division, Material Science and Engineering Laboratory at NIST. The National Institute of Standards and Technology is an agency of the Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

COPYRIGHT 2004 National Institute of Standards and Technology

COPYRIGHT 2005 Gale Group