Data bank – District Commercial Bank Deposit Data – Brief Article – Illustration – Statistical Data Included
DATA BANK
DISTRICT COMMERCIAL BANK DEPOSIT DATA (1)
($ millions)
June 30, 2001 June 30, 2000
United States (2) 3,588,778 3,328,634
Sixth District (3) 485,331 462,989
Sixth District States
Alabama 52,869 51,092
Florida 188,996 177,945
Georgia 98,215 93,384
Louisiana 45,339 43,409
Mississippi 29,588 28,304
Tennessee 70,324 68,855
Selected Metropolitan Areas
Birmingham, AL 14,514 14,243
Fort Lauderdale, FL 16,754 16,126
Jacksonville, FL 10,379 9,753
Miami, FL 39,179 35,228
Orlando, FL 16,592 14,819
Tampa, FL 28,988 28,077
West Palm Beach, FL 14,140 14,072
Atlanta, GA 54,923 52,624
New Orleans, LA 15,812 15,029
Jackson, MS 5,185 5,028
Memphis, AR-MS-TN 17,986 17,816
Nashville, TN 16,132 15,889
Total Urban Deposits in District 370,842 367,325
Total Rural Deposits in District 90,889 95,663
June 30, 1999
United States (2) 3,154,414
Sixth District (3) 441,515
Sixth District States
Alabama 50,868
Florida 171,624
Georgia 86,130
Louisiana 41,272
Mississippi 27,017
Tennessee 64,603
Selected Metropolitan Areas
Birmingham, AL 15,629
Fort Lauderdale, FL 16,434
Jacksonville, FL 10,110
Miami, FL 35,033
Orlando, FL 14,086
Tampa, FL 26,367
West Palm Beach, FL 13,839
Atlanta, GA 47,748
New Orleans, LA 14,416
Jackson, MS 5,058
Memphis, AR-MS-TN 15,887
Nashville, TN 15,776
Total Urban Deposits in District 350,451
Total Rural Deposits in District 91,064
Annual Percent Change
2001-2000 2000-1999
United States (2) 7.82 5.52
Sixth District (3) 4.83 4.86
Sixth District States
Alabama 3.48 0.44
Florida 6.21 3.68
Georgia 5.17 8.42
Louisiana 4.45 5.18
Mississippi 4.54 4.76
Tennessee 2.13 6.58
Selected Metropolitan Areas
Birmingham, AL 1.90 -8.87
Fort Lauderdale, FL 3.89 -1.87
Jacksonville, FL 6.42 -3.53
Miami, FL 11.22 0.56
Orlando, FL 11.96 5.20
Tampa, FL 3.24 6.49
West Palm Beach, FL 0.48 1.68
Atlanta, GA 4.37 10.21
New Orleans, LA 5.21 4.25
Jackson, MS 3.12 -0.59
Memphis, AR-MS-TN 0.95 12.14
Nashville, TN 1.53 0.72
Total Urban Deposits in District 0.96 4.82
Total Rural Deposits in District -4.99 5.05
(1) Includes thrifts owned by bank holding companies
(2) Includes territories
(3) Refers to all Sixth District states in their entirety
Source: Bank data are taken from the June 30 Summary of Deposits
Reports filed with the FDIC, compiled by SNL Securities. Some deposits,
particularly corporate deposits, were reported at bank offices other
than those where the deposits were taken. Merger and acquisition
activity is one major reason for a bank to misreport deposits in this
way.
COPYRIGHT 2002 www.frbatlanta.org
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group