Insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes: rescue, augmentation, and replacement of beta-cell function
Jennifer A. Mayfield
Twenty-level of 7 seven percent of persons with type 2 diabetes use insulin therapy, but less than one half achieve the recommended A1C percent or less. (1) These statistics suggest that suboptimal insulin therapy is too common. New insulin preparations and a better understanding of insulin physiology provide more options for family physicians attempting to effectively tailor insulin therapy to the needs of individual patients.
This overview describes how basal and bolus insulin release in type 2 diabetes differs from normal patterns of insulin release and discusses the indications for insulin therapy and injectable insulin characteristics. The authors present evidence supporting various insulin regimens to restore, augment, or replace beta-cell function and offer suggestions for using analogue insulins.
Pathophysiology of the Beta Cell
Blood glucose is derived from carbohydrates absorbed in the gut and produced in the liver. Absolute and increasing blood glucose levels stimulate insulin release. (2) The postprandial glucose influx can be 20 to 30 times higher than hepatic production between meals. Phase 1 insulin release, lasting 10 minutes, sup-presses hepatic glucose production and facilitates phase 2 release, which lasts two hours and covers mealtime carbohydrates. Between meals, a low continuous insulin level, called basal insulin, serves ongoing metabolic needs.
The normal beta cell responds in a linear fashion to blood glucose levels. The slope of this response is steeper after fasting and flattened following prolonged exposure to high glucose levels. This loss of responsiveness to glucose levels, which may be reversible in the earlier stages, also is called beta-cell exhaustion or glucose toxicity. (3)
In type 2 diabetes, phase 1 release is absent, and phase 2 release is delayed and inadequate. The sharp spike of mealtime insulin release occurring in normal persons (white back-ground in Figure 1) is delayed, prolonged, and insufficient in amount in patients with type 2 diabetes. Before diagnosis and treatment, the beta cell produces excess insulin to accommodate insulin resistance, but eventually the beta cell is replaced with amyloid, and insulin production declines. (4)
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
When type 2 diabetes is clinically diagnosed, only 50 percent of normal beta-cell function remains. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) (5) demonstrated that this function continues to deteriorate over time despite treatment with diet, exercise, metformin (Glucophage), sulfonyl-ureas, or insulin. Thiazolidinediones appear to preserve beta-cell function in women who had gestational diabetes, thus potentially pre-venting or delaying the onset of diabetes. (6) However, the ability of these drugs to preserve beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes has not yet been proved.
Beta-cell function cannot be estimated accurately on the basis of endogenous insulin levels because of the pulsatile release pattern and short half-life (six to seven minutes). A more accurate estimate is provided by levels of C-peptide, a byproduct of insulin production with a half-life of 30 minutes. However, a low C-peptide level cannot differentiate nearly extinct beta-cell function from reversible glucose toxicity; thus, its determination rarely changes therapy.
Endogenous insulin release can be stimulated by meglitinides (phase 1) or sulfonylureas (phase 2). Sulfonylureas have a 5 to 10 percent annual failure rate (fasting plasma glucose level greater than 200 mg per dL [11.1 mmol per L]). (7)
Injectable insulin is categorized as basal or bolus insulin based on the duration of action (Table 1 (8) and Figure 2). Basal insulins include neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) or isophane insulin (Novolin N, Humulin N), ultralente (extended insulin zinc suspension), and the insulin analogue glargine (Lantus). (9) Bolus or mealtime insulins include regular insulin (Novolin R, Humulin R) and the analogue forms aspart (NovoLog) and lispro (Humalog). (10) Premixed formulations incorporate NPH and regular or rapid-acting analogues. Inhaled, transdermal, and oral insulin formulations are in development.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Traditional insulins (i.e., regular, NPH, and ultralente) have two features that complicate therapy. First, their absorption profiles are erratic, creating day-to-day fluctuations in glycemic control. (9) Second, their delayed onset of action and peak activity requires coordination of injection and meals. Regular insulin must be injected 30 to 60 minutes before the meal to match postprandial glucose influx. NPH may cause hypoglycemia during its peak at four to 10 hours after injection unless the patient remembers to eat. Premixed formulations of NPH and regular insulin provide a bimodal pattern of insulin activity that rigidly dictates meal size and timing for the next 12 hours.
These problems are avoided with analogue insulins (i.e., glargine, aspart, and lispro)–so named because one to three amino acids have been substituted in the human insulin protein, producing altered absorption rates and more reliable absorption profiles. Lis-pro and aspart are active within 15 minutes and peak in about one hour, mimicking normal mealtime insulin release. (10) Glargine provides a peakless, continuous release over 24 hours that approximates a normal basal pattern. (9,11) The analogue insulins cost 60 to 100 percent more than traditional insulins.
Insulin therapy always can achieve glycemic control and may be initiated at any time.
An algorithm for instituting insulin therapy is provided in Figure 3. The most common indication for insulin therapy is failure to achieve glycemic control with diet, exercise, and oral medications. Within three years of diagnosis, only 33 percent of patients treated with metformin and sulfonylurea have an A1C level that is less than 7 percent. (12) In the UKPDS, (13) an A1C level of 7 percent or less was found to decrease the risk of microvascular outcomes–mainly retinal photocoagulation–but not cardiovascular disease. However, in the Steno-2 study, (14) a combination of glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure control reduced mortality by 50 percent compared with usual therapy. Insulin therapy also is indicated in patients with contraindications to antidiabetic medications. (15)
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
Intensive insulin therapy was found to reduce morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients in a surgical intensive care unit compared with usual therapy. (16) In patients who had experienced a myocardial infarct, intensive insulin therapy resulted in a 30 percent lower risk of death compared with usual therapy. (17) Pregnant women with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes should be given insulin to stabilize glucose levels. Tight glycemic control before conception decreases the risk of miscarriage and birth defects (18) and, in the third trimester, tight control decreases macrosomia and its attendant complications. (19)
Glucose toxicity, which is exhibited as a fasting plasma glucose level greater than 250 mg per dL (13.9 mmol per L), and ketonuria, weight loss, or symptomatic hyperglycemia, can be addressed promptly with insulin therapy. Many patients regain beta-cell function after a few weeks of intensive therapy, enabling them to return to management with diet or oral medication for several months to years. (20,21)
Contraindications and Adverse Effects
There are no medical contraindications to insulin therapy. Although no insulin has a category A pregnancy classification, regular and NPH insulin have been used extensively in pregnant women. Lispro has a category B classification, (22) and aspart and glargine have a category C classification. (23,24) Glargine is approved for use in patients six years and older (24) ; no other insulins have an age restriction.
The most serious adverse effect of insulin therapy is hypoglycemia, but the frequency and severity of this effect is less in type diabetes than in type 1 diabetes. In the UKPDS, (13) major hypoglycemia occurred in 2.3 percent of patients per year who were treated with insulin compared with rates of 0.1 to 0.4 percent in those on diet or sulfonylurea therapy. The risk of hypoglycemia increases significantly when the A1C level is below 7.4 percent. (25) Hypoglycemia risks can be minimized with use of analogue insulin; careful timing of injections, meals, and exercise; frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose levels; and patient education about self-adjustment of the insulin dose and management of hypoglycemia.
Weight gain is a common side effect of insulin therapy. In the UKPDS, (13) patients taking insulin gained 4 kg (8 lb, 13 oz) more than those treated with diet therapy over 10 years. Weight gain can be modified by increasing exercise, restricting calories, and administering metformin concurrently. (25,26) The benefits of insulin administration out-weigh the health risks of increased weight.
Exogenous insulin does not increase the risk of macrovascular disease or exacerbate insulin resistance. (13) All insulins are made using genetic recombinant techniques, so insulin allergy is uncommon.
Theoretically, the ideal insulin therapy regimen should mimic normal physiologic insulin release (Figure 1). The insulin regimen should be tailored to the patient’s degree of hyperglycemia, the risks associated with hypoglycemia, comorbid conditions, the ability to adhere to a routine and understand and master the information and skills, and the cost. Table 2 offers tips on initiating insulin therapy.
Augmentation therapy is effective in patients with residual but insufficient beta-cell function, which is exhibited as failure to maintain the A1C goal while taking oral medications. (15) Augmentation therapy usually is provided with basal insulin using bedtime NPH (Figure 4), NPH twice daily, ultralente once daily, or glargine once daily, adjusted to maintain a fasting plasma glucose level between 90 and 130 mg per dL (5 and 7.2 mmol per L). Augmentation also can be provided at mealtime using regular insulin (Figure 5), aspart, or lispro (27,28) adjusted to maintain two-hour postprandial glucose levels of 180 mg per dL (10 mmol per L) or less. Compared with a single basal insulin injection, the same amount of insulin divided into several bolus injections provides fewer postprandial glucose fluctuations, a lower A1C level, and greater weight gain. (29)
[FIGURES 4 & 5 OMITTED]
Bolus insulin without basal insulin, called sliding-scale therapy, often is blamed for erratic glycemic control in hospital settings. In an observational study of hospitalized patients of unspecified diabetes type, those treated with sliding-scale therapy had a threefold higher risk of hyperglycemia. (30) Patients too sick to use their usual oral medications should receive basal insulin with periodic bolus adjustments that are called supplemental or corrective insulin.
Replacement therapy using basal-bolus insulin regimens is indicated for patients who need intensive control or have failed augmentation therapy. Short-term rescue therapy for glucose toxicity employs the same regimens. The most convenient basal-bolus regimen uses split-mixed injection of NPH and regular insulin before breakfast and dinner but requires rigid adherence to a set meal size and time. Premixed formulations may not match patient requirements. The morning NPH may not provide adequate coverage for lunch, and the evening NPH may cause nocturnal hypoglycemia. If NPH wanes in the early morning, resulting in an elevated fasting plasma glucose level, the second NPH insulin injection can be moved to bedtime, keeping the regular injection at dinner, for a total of three injections a day using two insulin vials (Figure 6).
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
Four injections a day of basal-bolus insulin provide a better approximation of nor-mal insulin release and more flexibility for patients with unpredictable schedules. Regimens include NPH and regular insulin, NPH with aspart or lispro, or glargine and aspart or lispro (Figure 7). In pregnant women and those planning pregnancy, traditional split-mixed, premixed, or basal plus meal-related insulin regimens are preferred.
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
In type 2 diabetes treated with mealtime lispro, A1C levels, quality of life, and number of hypoglycemic episodes are similar to those of regular insulin. (31-33) Lispro and aspart provide one- and two-hour postprandial glucose levels that are 30 and 50 percent lower than regular insulin, respectively. (28,31) This finding may be clinically important if postprandial control is demonstrated in a prospective study to provide as much cardiovascular benefit as has been noted in observational studies. (34)
In type 1 diabetes, when lispro is compared with regular insulin, it provides a better quality of life because of schedule flexibility, less hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, and less weight gain, (31) suggesting that rapid-acting analogues may be useful in patients with severe insulin deficiency (C-peptide level [less than or equal to] 0.2 pmol per mL35), frequent severe hypoglycemia, or an unpredictable schedule.
Basal coverage with glargine provides A1C levels similar to those of NPH, but with less nocturnal hypoglycemia (4.0 versus 6.9 episodes per patient-year) and less frequent severe hypoglycemia (3.0 versus 5.1 episodes per patient-year).36-38 Glargine injected in the morning rather than at bed-time, titrated to a fasting plasma glucose goal of 100 mg per dL (5.6 mmol per L) or less, resulted in a lower A1C level (7.8 per-cent versus 8.1 percent) and less nocturnal hypoglycemia (17 percent versus 23 percent of patients with one or more episodes). (39)
The most faithful imitation of normal beta-cell function is provided by an implant-able insulin pump. A study of patients with type 2 diabetes demonstrated reduced weight gain, less frequent episodes of mild clinical hypoglycemia, and improved overall quality of life with the pump, compared with multiple daily injections. (40)
The starting insulin dose for augmentation is calculated as 0.2 units per kg per day. (15,41) Another safe calculation is units of insulin per day equals fasting plasma glucose level in mmol per L. For example, a patient with a fasting plasma glucose level of 250 mg per dL (13.9 mmol per L) would be given 14 units of insulin each day. (41) The starting dose for replacement therapy is 0.5 mg per kg per day. Twofold to fourfold higher doses often are required for patients with insulin resistance. (15) There is no limit to the amount of insulin that can be used safely. U-500 (500 units per 1 mL) regular insulin is available for use in patients who require large amounts of insulin. Volumes greater than 0.5 mL (50 units of U-100 insulin) should be split and injected in separate areas to facilitate absorption.
Fifty to 60 percent of the total insulin dose should be provided as basal form and 40 to 50 percent as bolus form. Table 3 offers suggestions for initiating glargine therapy. (38,39)
The mealtime bolus is the sum of four factors that spell “SAFE.”
Supplemental Insulin. Supplemental (or correctional) insulin is added or subtracted to bring the pre-meal or bedtime glucose levels into the desired range. Insulin-sensitive patients require 1 unit of insulin to change the blood sugar level by 50 mg per dL (2.8 mmol per L); insulin-resistant patients experience a smaller change.
Activity. The dose should be decreased by 30 percent for postprandial exercise of less than one hour; by 40 percent for exercise of one to two hours; and by 50 percent for exercise of more than two hours. Increased insulin sensitivity may persist for 12 to 48 hours after exercise and can cause clinical hypoglycemia. (42,43) The insulin dose may decrease as patients train, improve physical fitness, reduce body fat, and decrease insulin resistance.
Food. Insulin to cover anticipated meal intake is based on the patient’s insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio. Insulin-sensitive patients require approximately 1 unit of insulin per 15 g of carbohydrate, but the ratio is often lower (1:10 or 1:5) in insulin-resistant patients. The insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio may vary by time of day or with certain foods (i.e., pizza). A nutritionist or certified diabetes educator can teach carbohydrate counting and suggest insulin adjustments to diet.
Experience. The self-monitoring record of blood glucose levels and insulin injections provides a way of learning what works for each patient. Blood glucose and insulin logs should be reviewed weekly until patients reach their goal. Adjustments should be made one at a time, changing a single injection dose 5 to 20 percent. The physician should address persistent hypoglycemia first, then increase basal insulin until the fasting plasma glucose level is 90 to 130 mg per dL, followed by adjustment of preprandial levels to 90 to 130 mg per dL. If the patient is still not at the A1C goal, the mealtime dose should be increased or the insulin should be switched to a rapid-acting analogue to reduce postprandial glucose levels to less than 180 mg per dL.
Oral Medications Plus Insulin
The synergistic effect of oral antidiabetic medications with insulin may allow the insulin dose to be reduced by up to 50 percent. (41) Metformin with insulin decreases weight gain, hypoglycemia, and diabetes-related end points. (26,44) Metformin does not need dose adjustments when administered with insulin. The combination of insulin with thiazolidinedione drugs (i.e., rosiglitazone [Avandia] and pioglitazone [Actos]) may cause edema and is contraindicated in patients with congestive heart failure. Pioglitazone is restricted to a 4-mg dose if co-administered with insulin. (45)
Co-administration of insulin with sulfonylureas may lower A1C levels and reduce the total daily insulin requirement if some beta-cell function remains. (41) Sulfonylureas are absorbed better if glucose levels have been normalized with insulin. (46)
Patients randomized to insulin NPH/regular 70/30 plus metformin achieved similar A1C levels, fasting plasma glucose levels, and weight gain but had lower daily costs ($3.20 versus $10.40) and treatment failures (16 percent versus 3.5 percent) than patients randomized to triple oral medication (a sulfonylurea, metformin, and thiazolidinedione). (47)
The online version of this article, available at http://www.aafp.org/afp/20040801/489.html addresses three illustrative cases.
The authors thank Evangeline Erskine, M.D., for comments on the manuscript. Dr. Mayfield indicates that she does not have any conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: none reported. Dr. White receives honoraria and/or consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic MiniMed, Pfizer Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.
Description of Onset, Peak, and Duration of Insulins
Insulin Onset (hours)
Bolus or mealtime insulin
Aspart (NovoLog) 5 to 10 minutes 1 to 3
Lispro (Humalog) < 15 minutes 0.5 to 1.5
Regular (Humulin R, 30 to 60 minutes 2 to 3
NPH (Humulin N, Novolin N) 2 to 4 hours 4 to 10
Lente (insulin zinc 3 to 4 hours 4 to 12
Ultralente (extended 6 to 10 hours Peakless
insulin zinc suspension)
Glargine (Lantus) 1 hour, 6 minutes Peakless
50% NPH/50% regular 30 to 60 minutes Dual
70% NPH/30% regular 30 to 60 minutes Dual
(Humulin R 70/30,
Novolin R 70/30)
75% NPL/25% lispro < 15 minutes Dual
70% NPH/30% aspart 5 to 10 minutes Dual
Insulin (hours) (hours) Cost *
Bolus or mealtime insulin
Aspart (NovoLog) 3 to 5 4 to 6 59
Lispro (Humalog) 2 to 4 4 to 6 59
Regular (Humulin R, 3 to 6 6 to 10 28
NPH (Humulin N, Novolin N) 10 to 16 14 to 18 28
Lente (insulin zinc 12 to 18 16 to 20
Ultralente (extended 18 to 20 20 to 24 28
insulin zinc suspension)
Glargine (Lantus) 24 24 51
50% NPH/50% regular 10 to 16 14 to 18
70% NPH/30% regular 10 to 16 14 to 18 28
(Humulin R 70/30,
Novolin R 70/30)
75% NPL/25% lispro 10 to 16 14 to 18 59 ([dagger])
70% NPH/30% aspart 10 to 16 14 to 18 59
NPH = neutral protamine Hagedorn; NPL = neutral protamine lispro.
*–Estimated cost to the pharmacist for one 10-ml vial based on
average wholesale prices in Red book. Montvale, N.J.: Medical
Economics Data, 2004. Cost to the patient will be higher, depending
on prescription filling fee.
([dagger])–20-mL volume only–cost shown is one half of the cost
of a 20-mL vial.
Adapted with permission from Resource guide 2004. Insulin. Diabetes
TABLE 2 Tips for Initiating Insulin Therapy
Discuss the possibility of insulin therapy well in advance of when it
needs to be implemented, so patients have time to explore their fears
and obtain information. Do not use insulin therapy as a threat when
discussing compliance with diet, exercise, and medications–even
compliant patients eventually require insulin.
Stock several insulin-start packets with instruction sheets,
informational handouts, syringes, needles, and insulin samples to
facilitate insulin initiation.
Consider use of insulin pens and other devices that do not require
Team up with a certified diabetes educator to teach patients
nutritional therapy and how to adjust their insulin. Communicate the
goals that you and the patient have discussed. Train one of the nursing
staff to teach insulin administration to patients who need to start
immediately and cannot wait for a scheduled meeting with the educator.
Tailor the insulin type and regimen to fit the patient’s lifestyle and
budget. Patients who have irregular hours and meals may find that
insulin glargine and rapid-acting analogues provide more flexibility,
while those with a set routine can do well with the traditional
Schedule patients for follow-up within one week to adjust insulin doses
and provide more education. Maintain contact with the patient through
office visits, telephone calls, fax, or secure e-mail every three to
seven days until blood sugar level is at the goal.
Always ask for the self-monitoring blood glucose log. Train staff to
remind the patient, when making an appointment, to bring the log. Have
the patient describe how he or she would make dose change decisions.
Reinforce good decisions and gently correct poor decisions. Use the
accompanying patient information handout to clarify future doses and
Always find something to praise.
Useful resources from the American Diabetes Association include
Insulin: A Handbook for Prescribers, 2002 (http://store.diabetes.org)
and the Diabetes Forecast Resource Guide published every January
Starting Glargine (Lantus) Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Patient has not taken insulin previously:10 units or 0.15 units per kg
once daily *
Patient has taken NPH insulin previously: Use 80 percent of the total
daily dose of NPH insulin. ([dagger]) Timing of injection: inject at
the same time every day.
If FPG <80 mg per dL (4.4 mmol per L) on three consecutive days or[greater than or equal to] 3 times in a week, decrease glargine
insulin by 2 units.
Review the FPG once a week. Increase insulin dose based on the FPG
levels of the past two days. Do not increase the dose more often than
once a week.
Mean of self-monitored FPG
from preceding two days, Increase insulin dose
mg per dL (mmol per L) (units)
>180 (10) 8
140 (7.7) to 180 6
120 (6.7) to 140 4
100 (5.6) to 120 2
The effects of glargine last 16 to 24 hours. Some patients require a
twice-daily schedule to maintain basal levels.
NPH = neutral protamine Hagedorn; FPG = fasting plasma glucose.
*–This starting dose is conser vative to minimize the risk of
hypoglycemia in a patient who may be insulin-sensitive.
([dagger])–Approximately 80 percent of NPH activity functions as
basal insulin; the other 20 percent functions as bolus insulin during
its small activity peak.
Adapted with permission from Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J.
The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human
NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care
Strength of Recommendations
Key Recommendation Label References
Rescue therapy using intensive C New-diagnosis diabetes (3, 20)
insulin therapy should be used Longstanding diabetes (21)
for patients with glucose
toxicity (i.e., fasting plasma
glucose >250 mg per dL (13.9
mmol per L), ketosis, weight
Augmentation with basal or C Basal insulin (15)
bolus insulin therapy can Bolus insulin (27)
restore glycemic control in
patients with residual
Replacement therapy with A 17
intensive insulin therapy
should be used for patients
with acute myocardial
Replacement therapy with B 16
intensive insulin therapy
should be used for patients
in the surgical intensive care
Replacement therapy with B 18, 19
intensive insulin therapy
should be used for women with
diabetes who are pregnant or
planning a pregnancy.
Basal therapy with glargine A 36, 37, 38
(Lantus) provides better A1C
and less nocturnal
hypoglycemia when compared
with bedtime NPH (Novolin N,
Bolus therapy with A 31, 32, 35
short-acting analogue (lispro[Humalog]) provides no
advantage over regular insulin
(Humulin R) for patients with
type 2 diabetes, but improves
treatment satisfaction and
lessens hypoglycemia for
patients with type 1 diabetes.
Hospitalized patients unable B 30
to take their usual medication
should receive basal insulin
with periodic bolus
Metformin (Glucophage) A 25, 26
combined with insulin is
preferred to insulin-only
Insulin plus metformin is cost C 47
effective compared with triple
oral medication therapy.
Key Recommendation Comments
Rescue therapy using intensive Several small uncontrolled trials of
insulin therapy should be used patients with new-diagnosis or
for patients with glucose longstanding diabetes demonstrate
toxicity (i.e., fasting plasma that intensive insulin therapy of
glucose >250 mg per dL (13.9 short duration may restore beta-cell
mmol per L), ketosis, weight function for many months to years.
Augmentation with basal or A randomized controlled trial
bolus insulin therapy can demonstrated lower fasting plasma
restore glycemic control in glucose levels with basal insulin as
patients with residual compared with bolus insulin, but bolus
beta-cell function. achieved lower postprandial glucose
and A1C levels.
Replacement therapy with 620 patients with acute myocardial
intensive insulin therapy infarction randomized to intensive
should be used for patients therapy for three or more months
with acute myocardial versus usual therapy demonstrated an
infarction. 11 percent reduction in mortality at
3.4 years of follow-up (number needed
to treat = 9).
Replacement therapy with Single study of 1,548 surgical
intensive insulin therapy intensive care unit patients
should be used for patients randomized to tight control (80 to
in the surgical intensive care 110 mg per dL [4.4 to 6.1 mmol per L])
unit. versus usual control demonstrated
reduced mortality (4.6 percent versus
8.0 percent), and reduced sepsis by
46 percent, dialysis by 42 percent,
and transfusions by 50 percent over
12 months of follow-up.
Replacement therapy with Major anomalies were reduced (1.2
intensive insulin therapy percent versus 10.9 percent) in
should be used for women with diabetic women with tight glycemic
diabetes who are pregnant or control before pregnancy compared with
planning a pregnancy. those referred after six weeks of
Macrosomia was associated with
postprandial glucose higher than
130 mg per dL (7.2 mmol per L)
between 29 and 32 weeks of gestation.
Basal therapy with glargine A study compared morning glargine
(Lantus) provides better A1C injection with bedtime glargine
and less nocturnal injection and bedtime NPH. At 24
hypoglycemia when compared weeks, A1C was 7.8, 8.1, and 8.3
with bedtime NPH (Novolin N, percent, respectively; nocturnal
Humulin N). hypoglycemia was 17, 23, and 38
Bolus therapy with Patients randomized to bolus therapy
short-acting analogue (lispro with lispro versus regular insulin[Humalog]) provides no achieved similar A1C and quality of
advantage over regular insulin life, but patients with type 1
(Humulin R) for patients with diabetes report improved treatment
type 2 diabetes, but improves flexibility and satisfaction and less
treatment satisfaction and hypoglycemia. Both achieved lower
lessens hypoglycemia for postprandial glucose levels with
patients with type 1 diabetes. analogue insulin therapy.
Hospitalized patients unable Observational studies show
to take their usual medication sliding-scale therapy using rapid-
should receive basal insulin or short-acting insulin without basal
with periodic bolus insulin results in higher rates of
adjustments. hyperglycemia in hospitalized
Metformin (Glucophage) Several randomized controlled trials
combined with insulin is demonstrate less weight gain and
preferred to insulin-only hypoglycemia with the addition of
therapy. metformin to insulin therapy.
Insulin plus metformin is cost 188 patients randomized to insulin
effective compared with triple 70/30 plus metformin versus triple
oral medication therapy. oral medication (sulfonylureas,
demonstrated equal A1C but lower cost
($3.20 versus $10.40 per day); 14
percent of the triple therapy group
failed treatment and had to start
NPH = neutral protamine Hagedorn.
(1.) Koro CE, Bowlin SJ, Bourgeois N, Fedder DO. Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among U.S. adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report. Diabetes Care 2004;27:17-20.
(2.) Kahn SE. The importance of the beta-cell in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2000;108(suppl 6a):2S-8S.
(3.) Glaser B, Cerasi E. Early intensive insulin treatment for induction of long-term glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 1999;1:67-74.
(4.) Polonsky KS, Given BD, Hirsch LJ, Tillil H, Shapiro ET, Beebe C, et al. Abnormal patterns of insulin secretion in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1988;318:1231-9.
(5.) U.K. prospective diabetes study 16. Overview of 6 years’ therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease [published correction appears in Diabetes 1996;45:1655]. Diabetes 1995;44:1249-58.
(6.) Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Peters RK, Kjos SL, Marroquin A, Goico J, et al. Preservation of pancreatic beta-cell function and prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk hispanic women. Diabetes 2002;51:2796-803.
(7.) Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA 1999;281:2005-12.
(8.) Resource guide 2004. Insulin. Diabetes Forecast 2004;57:RG14,RG16-9.
(9.) Lepore M, Pampanelli S, Fanelli C, Porcellati F, Bartocci L, Di Vincenzo A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous injection of long-acting human insulin analogue glargine, NPH insulin, and ultralente human insulin and continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin lispro. Diabetes 2000;49:2142-8.
(10.) Holleman F, Hoekstra JB. Insulin lispro [published correction appears in N Engl J Med 2003;349:1487]. N Engl J Med 1997;337:176-83.
(11.) Wang F, Carabino JM, Vergara CM. Insulin glargine: a systemic review of a long-acting insulin analogue. Clin Ther 2003;25:1541-77.
(12.) UKPDS 28: a randomized trial of efficacy of early addition of metformin in sulfonylurea-treated type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998;21:87-92.
(13.) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) [published correction appears in Lancet 1999;354:602]. Lancet 1998;352:837-53.
(14.) Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003;348:383-93.
(15.) Skyler JS. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. In: DeFronzo RA, ed. Current therapy of diabetes mellitus. St. Louis: Mosby, 1998:108-16.
(16.) Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-67.
(17.) Davies MJ, Lawrence IG. DIGAMI (Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction): theory and practice. Diabetes Obes Metab 2002;4:289-95.
(18.) Kitzmiller JL, Gavin LA, Gin GD, Jovanovic-Peterson L, Main EK, Zigrang WD. Preconception care of diabetes. Glycemic control prevents congenital anomalies. JAMA 1991;265:731-6.
(19.) Combs CA, Gunderson E, Kitzmiller JL, Gavin LA, Main EK. Relationship of fetal macrosomia to maternal post-prandial glucose control during pregnancy. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1251-7.
(20.) Ilkova H, Glaser B, Tunckale A, Bagriacik N, Cerasi E. Induction of long-term glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients by transient intensive insulin treatment. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1353-6.
(21.) Karvestedt L, Andersson G, Efendic S, Grill V. A rapid increase in beta-cell function by multiple insulin injections in type 2 diabetic patients is not further enhanced by prolonging treatment. J Intern Med 2002;251:307-16.
(22.) Humalog [package insert]. Indianapolis, Ind.: Eli Lilly and Co., 2002. Accessed online April 9, 2004, at: http://pi.lilly.com/us/humalog-pen-pi.pdf.
(23.) NovoLog [package insert]. Princeton, N.J.: Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2002. Accessed online April 9, 2004, at: http://www.novolog.com/consumer/assets/NovoLog_Prescribing_Info.pdf.
(24.) Lantus [package insert]. Kansas City, Mo.: Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2003. Accessed online April 9, 2004, at: http://www.aventispharma-us.com/PIs/lantus.pdf.
(25.) Yki-Jarvinen H, Ryysy L, Nikkila K, Tulokas T, Vanamo R, Heikkila M. Comparison of bedtime insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:389-96.
(26.) Strowig SM, Aviles-Santa ML, Raskin P. Comparison of insulin monotherapy and combination therapy with insulin and metformin or insulin and troglitazone in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1691-8.
(27.) Bastyr EJ 3d, Stuart CA, Brodows RG, Schwarz S, Graf CJ, Zagar A, et al. Therapy focused on lowering post-prandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1236-41.
(28.) Home PD, Lindholm A, Hylleberg B, Round P. Improved glycemic control with insulin aspart: a multicenter randomized double-blind crossover trial in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1904-9.
(29.) Bastyr EJ 3d, Johnson ME, Trautmann ME, Anderson JH Jr, Vignati L. Insulin lispro in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after oral agent failure. Clin Ther 1999;21:1703-14.
(30.) Queale WS, Seidler AJ, Brancati FL. Glycemic control and sliding scale insulin use in medical inpatients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:545-52.
(31.) Anderson JH Jr, Brunelle RL, Keohane P, Koivisto VA, Trautmann ME, Vignati L, et al. Mealtime treatment with insulin analogue improves postprandial hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1249-55.
(32.) Anderson JH Jr, Brunelle RL, Koivisto VA, Trautmann ME, Vignati L, DiMarchi R. Improved mealtime treatment of diabetes mellitus using an insulin analogue. Clin Ther 1997;19:62-72.
(33.) Siebenhofer A, Plank J, Berghold A, Narath M, Gfrerer R, Pieber T. Short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin in patients with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(2):CD003287.
(34.) Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. Lancet 1999;354:617-21.
(35.) Service FJ, Rizza RA, Zimmerman BR, Dyck PJ, O’Brien PC, Melton LJ 3d. The classification of diabetes by clinical and C-peptide criteria. A prospective population-based study. Diabetes Care 1997;20:198-201.
(36.) Yki-Jarvinen H, Dressler A, Ziemen M. Less nocturnal hypoglycemia and better post-dinner glucose control with bedtime insulin glargine compared with bedtime NPH insulin during insulin combination therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1130-6.
(37.) Rosenstock J, Schwartz SL, Clark CM Jr, Park GD, Donley DW, Edwards MB. Basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: 28-week comparison of insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH insulin. Diabetes Care 2001;24:631-6.
(38.) Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3080-6.
(39.) Fritsche A, Schweitzer MA, Haring HU. Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:952-9.
(40.) Saudek CD, Duckworth WC, Giobbie-Hurder A, Henderson WG, Henry RR, Kelley DE, et al. Implantable insulin pump vs multiple-dose insulin for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 1996;276:1322-7.
(41.) Yki-Jarvinen H. Combination therapies with insulin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001;24:758-67.
(42.) Perseghin G, Price TB, Petersen KF, Roden M, Cline GW, Gerow K, et al. Increased glucose transport-phosphorylation and muscle glycogen synthesis after exercise training in insulin-resistant subjects. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1357-62.
(43.) Maynard T. Exercise: part I. Physiological response to exercise in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ 1991;17: 196-206.
(44.) Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34) [published correction appears in Lancet 1998;352:1557]. Lancet 1998;352:854-65.
(45.) Avandia [package insert]. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: GlaxoSmithKline, 2003. Accessed online April 9, 2004, at: http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_avandia.pdf.
(46.) Hoffman A, Fischer Y, Gilhar D, Raz I. The effect of hyperglycaemia on the absorption of glibenclamide in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1994;47:53-5.
(47.) Schwartz S, Sievers R, Strange P, Lyness WH, Hollander P. Insulin 70/30 mix plus metformin versus triple oral therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes after failure of two oral drugs: efficacy, safety, and cost analysis. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2238-43.
Patient information: A handout on insulin therapy, written by the authors of this article, is provided on page 511.
See page 425 for definitions of strength-of-recommendation labels.
JENNIFER A. MAYFIELD, M.D., M.P.H., is a locum tenens physician and health care research consultant in western Washington. She graduated from Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, Calif., and completed a family practice residency at the University of Minnesota Medical School in Minneapolis, Minn. She was a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar at the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. She was the epidemiologist for the Diabetes Program of the Indian Health Service for three years and served two years as chair of the American Diabetes Association’s Council on Foot Care and two years on the editorial board of Clinical Diabetes.
RUSSELL D. WHITE, M.D., has a private practice in St. Petersburg, Fla., and is clinical associate professor of family medicine at the University of South Florida College of Medicine in Tampa. He received his medical degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine, Columbia, and completed a family practice residency at the University of Missouri Health Sciences Center, also in Columbia. He has completed two years on the editorial board of Clinical Diabetes. He was a member of the steering committee and program faculty for the American Diabetes Association’s Clinical Education Program in 2003, entitled “Insulin Therapy in the 21st Century.”
Address correspondence to Jennifer A. Mayfield, M.D., M.P.H., 21609 57th Ave. SE, Woodinville, WA 98072 (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org). Reprints are not available from the authors.
JENNIFER A. MAYFIELD, M.D., M.P.H.
RUSSELL D. WHITE, M.D.
University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
COPYRIGHT 2004 American Academy of Family Physicians
COPYRIGHT 2004 Gale Group