Preoperative cardiac risk assessment

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment

Bernard M. Karnath

Perioperative management of the elderly patient is increasingly important as the elderly population continues to grow. Currently, there are more than 34 million elderly persons in the United States. (1) Heart disease is the leading cause of mortality in the United States, accounting for nearly half a million deaths in 1998. (2)

Each year, approximately 50,000 patients have perioperative myocardial infarctions (MIs) and about 40 percent will die. (3) Most perioperative MIs occur without the typical chest pain. Factors that may contribute to the silent nature of perioperative MI include use of analgesics after surgery, residual effects from the anesthesia, and other perioperative painful stimuli. (3) Risk factors for perioperative cardiac complications include coronary artery disease (CAD), previous MI, heart failure, aortic stenosis, and age older than 70 years. Other clinical predictors are diabetes, poorly controlled hypertension, and poor functional capacity. (4)

Two studies (5,6) have evaluated the incidence of MI after general anesthesia in patients with previous MI. A reinfarction rate of 27 to 37 percent occurred in patients who underwent surgery within three months of infarction. The reinfarction rate was 11 to 16 percent in patients who underwent surgery between three and six months of MI. The reinfarction rate remained stable (5 percent) for patients who underwent surgery more than six months after MI.

Preoperative Cardiac Risk Index

Goldman and colleagues (7) were the first to develop a preoperative cardiac risk index with multifactorial predictors. They evaluated 1,001 consecutive patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and reported nine variables associated with an increased risk for perioperative cardiac complications. Each risk factor was assigned a point score, and patients were stratified into four risk categories based on their total points.

In 1986, Detsky and colleagues (8) modified the original multifactorial index by adding variables such as angina and pulmonary edema (Table 1 (7,8)). With this index, patients are stratified into three risk categories based on their total points. The modified index also adds predictive information for patients undergoing major and minor surgery. Major surgeries include vascular, orthopedic, intrathoracic, intraperitoneal, and head and neck surgery. Examples of minor surgeries are cataract procedures and prostate surgery.

American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Guideline

In a joint effort, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) produced a guideline for preoperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. The guideline incorporates clinical predictors and functional status into the preoperative risk-assessment algorithm (Figure 1). (4) The guideline was updated in early 2002 with an emphasis on optimizing the assessment of cardiac risk without subjecting the patient to unnecessary intervention that would otherwise not be indicated. (9) Patients are stratified according to major, intermediate, or minor “clinical predictors” of increased cardiac risk. Those who have had coronary revascularization within five years or a favorable result on coronary angiography or cardiac stress testing within two years may proceed to surgery without further cardiac evaluation.


Recommendations for preoperative testing are based on the clinical predictors identified by the patient’s history and physical examination (Table 2 (4)). Major clinical predictors include unstable angina, recent MI, decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF), significant arrhythmias, and severe valvular disease. The presence of major predictors may justify a delay or cancellation of elective surgery or warrants preoperative coronary angiography if surgery is still deemed necessary.

Intermediate clinical predictors include mild angina, previous MI, compensated or previous CHF, diabetes, and renal insufficiency. The presence of intermediate predictors warrants careful assessment of the patient’s functional capacity when deciding whether preoperative cardiac testing is needed (Table 3). (10,11)

Minor clinical predictors include advanced age, abnormal results on electrocardiography, rhythm other than sinus on electrocardiography, poor functional capacity, history of stroke, and uncontrolled hypertension. Patients who have minor or no clinical predictors do not require further cardiac testing unless functional capacity is poor.


Poor functional capacity is associated with increased cardiac complications in noncardiac surgery. (12) A patient’s functional capacity can be expressed in metabolic equivalents (METs). (10,11) One MET equals the oxygen consumption of a 70-kg, 40-year-old man in a resting state.


Surgical procedures are classified as high, intermediate, or low risk. (4) Emergency surgery is considered a high-risk procedure and is associated with significantly increased risk compared with elective surgery. (7,8) Other high-risk surgical procedures include aortic surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, and anticipated prolonged surgical procedures associated with large fluid shifts or blood loss. (4) Intermediate-risk surgical procedures include orthopedic, urologic, and uncomplicated abdominal, thoracic, or head and neck surgeries. Examples of low-risk surgical procedures include endoscopic and dermatologic procedures, breast surgery, and cataract resection.

American College of Physicians Guideline

The American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline recommends that all patients first be evaluated with the modified cardiac risk index by Detsky. (13) [Evidence level C, expert opinion] Patients stratified as Class I are considered low risk but should be further stratified with low-risk variables identified in separate studies. (14,15) [Reference 14–Evidence level B, retrospective study] Patients stratified as Class II or Class III on the modified cardiac risk index are at high risk for perioperative cardiac events (Figure 2). (8,13-15)


Eagle and colleagues identified five clinical predictors of perioperative cardiac events. (14) These clinical predictors included Q waves on electrocardiography, history of ventricular ectopic beats, diabetes, advanced age, and angina. Patients with no clinical predictors had a 3 percent incidence of perioperative ischemic events. Having one or two clinical predictors meant a 16 percent incidence of perioperative ischemic events. Patients with three or more clinical predictors had a 50 percent incidence of perioperative ischemic events.

Vanzetto and colleagues identified a similar set of clinical predictors of perioperative cardiac events. (15) These clinical predictors included those cited by Eagle, but Vanzetto and colleagues added history of MI, ST-segment abnormalities on electrocardiography, hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy, and history of CHF.

Two Separate Guidelines and Algorithms

The ACC/AHA preoperative guideline and algorithm were first published in 1996. The ACC/AHA algorithm instructs the physician to evaluate the patient for the presence or absence of CAD before clinical predictors factor into the decision. The ACP preoperative guideline was published in 1997 and incorporates the Detsky criteria as the initial screening method for stratifying patients into low- or high-risk categories. The similarities and differences between the guidelines are outlined in Table 4. (7,8,14,15) Both preoperative guidelines are evidence-based.


The general consensus among experts is to allow the anesthesiologist to choose the type of anesthesia. Evidence from studies done before publication of the guidelines suggested that general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia did not differ significantly in their rates of perioperative cardiac complications. (16,17) [Reference 16–Evidence level A, randomized controlled trial (RCT). Reference 17–Evidence level A, RCT]

Three studies (18-20) comparing regional versus general anesthesia have been published since the release of the ACC/AHA and ACP guidelines. In one study, researchers were unable to demonstrate a significant difference in the cardiac complication rate for regional versus general anesthesia. (18) [Evidence level B, retrospective study] However, two other studies demonstrated a lower incidence of MI in patients who received regional or spinal anesthesia. (19,20) [Reference 19–Evidence level A, systematic review of RCTs. Reference 20–Evidence level A, meta-analysis]


According to the ACC/AHA guideline, patients with minor clinical predictors do not require noninvasive testing unless they have poor functional capacity and are undergoing a high-risk procedure. Patients with intermediate clinical predictors require noninvasive testing if they are undergoing a high-risk procedure or have poor functional capacity. The ACP advocates noninvasive stress testing for intermediate-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery; otherwise, stress testing is not mentioned in the algorithm. Several studies regarding noninvasive testing have been published since the release of the ACC/AHA and ACP guidelines.

Exercise Treadmill Testing. The ACP recommends against exercise stress testing to predict perioperative risk, stating that it cannot be performed in a significant proportion of patients who are undergoing vascular surgery or in patients with diseases that impair the ability to ambulate.

One study (21) evaluated exercise testing in predicting cardiac complications after vascular surgery. According to the study results, patients who achieved more than 85 percent of their predicted maximum heart rate had a 6 percent rate of cardiac complications, whereas patients who did not achieve 85 percent of their predicted maximum heart rate had a 24 percent rate of cardiac complications.

Dipyridamole-Thallium Imaging and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography. The ACP recommends using either dipyridamole-thallium imaging (DTI) or dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for further risk stratification in intermediate-risk patients who are undergoing vascular surgery. Eagle and colleagues (14) evaluated the effectiveness of preoperative DTI in predicting ischemic events after vascular surgery. The study results showed that preoperative DTI was most useful for stratifying vascular patients at intermediate risk. Patients with one or two Eagle criteria were considered intermediate risk. Within this group, 3 percent of patients without thallium redistribution had perioperative cardiac complications, compared with 30 percent of patients with thallium redistribution.

According to the ACP, DTI or DSE may not reliably predict perioperative cardiac complications in patients undergoing nonvascular surgery. (13) However, a recent study (22) evaluated 530 patients who underwent DSE before nonvascular surgery. DSE results showed 60 percent of patients with no ischemic changes, 32 percent of patients with ischemic changes at high levels of cardiac stress, and 8 percent of patients with ischemic changes at low levels of cardiac stress. (22) Perioperative cardiac event rates were zero percent, 9 percent, and 43 percent, respectively.

Perioperative Beta Blockers

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 200 patients who were undergoing elective noncardiac surgery that required general anesthesia, the effect of atenolol on perioperative cardiac complications was evaluated. (23) [Evidence level A, RCT] Patients were eligible for beta-blocker therapy if they had known CAD or two or more risk factors. Atenolol was not used if the resting heart rate was less than 55 beats per minute, systolic blood pressure was less than 100 mm Hg, or if there was evidence of CHF, third-degree heart block, or bronchospasm. A 5-mg dose of intravenous atenolol was given 30 minutes before surgery and then again immediately after surgery. Atenolol (50 to 100 mg) was given orally until hospital discharge or seven days postoperatively. The results of the study showed that mortality from cardiac causes was 65 percent lower in the patients receiving atenolol.

A similar study evaluated the effect of bisoprolol on perioperative cardiac complications. (24) [Evidence level A, RCT] Treatment with bisoprolol in a dosage of 5 to 10 mg once daily was started one week before surgery and continued for 30 more days. The incidence of serious cardiac complications was 34 percent in the placebo group and only 3 percent in the patients receiving bisoprolol. Use of perioperative beta blockers reduced cardiac-related mortality in patients with known or suspected coronary heart disease.


Functional Status Assessment

Excellent (>7 METs) Moderate (4 to 7 METs) Poor (<4 METs)

Squash Cycling Vacuuming

Jogging (10-minute mile) Climbing a flight of Activities of daily

Scrubbing floors stairs living (e.g.,

Singles tennis Golf (without cart) eating, dressing,

Walking 4 mph bathing)

Yardwork (e.g., raking Walking 2 mph

leaves, weeding, Writing

pushing a power


METs = metabolic equivalents.

Information from references 10 and 11.


Similarities and Differences Between

the ACC/AHA and ACP Guidelines


Emergent surgery proceeds directly to the operating room without

further risk stratification.

Both algorithms incorporate the Detsky predictors. (8)

Patients are eventually stratified into low-, intermediate-, or

high-risk categories.

ACC/AHA preoperative guideline ACP preoperative guideline


The presence or absence of CAD is The Detsky criteria (8) are the

the first risk assessment. first determinants of risk


Clinical predictors derived from Minor clinical predictors derived

Goldman and Detsky from Eagle and Vanzetto

criteria. (7,8) criteria. (14,15)

Functional status incorporated ACP felt functional status not

into the algorithm. proved to be useful risk


Patients with poor functional Patients undergoing vascular

status require stress testing. surgery require stress testing.

ACC/AHA = American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association;

ACP = American College of Physicians; CAD = coronary artery disease.

Information from references 7, 8, 14, and 15.

The author indicates that he does not have any conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: none reported.


(1.) National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 1999. Hyattsville, Md.: 1999. Accessed October 28, 2002 at: data/hus/hus99.pdf.

(2.) Mortality from coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction–United States, 1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2001;50:90-3.

(3.) Mangano DT. Perioperative cardiac morbidity. Anesthesiology 1990;72:153-84.

(4.) Eagle KA, Brundage BH, Chaitman BR, Ewy GA, Fleisher LA, Hertzer NR, et al. Guidelines for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:910-48.

(5.) Tarhan S, Moffitt EA, Taylor WF, Giuliani ER. Myocardial infarction after general anesthesia. JAMA 1972;220:1451-4.

(6.) Steen PA, Tinker JH, Tarhan S. Myocardial reinfarction after anesthesia and surgery. JAMA 1978;239: 2566-70.

(7.) Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 1977;297:845-50.

(8.) Detsky AS, Abrams HB, McLaughlin JR, Drucker DJ, Sasson Z, Johnston N, et al. Predicting cardiac complications in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. J Gen Intern Med 1986;1:211-9.

(9.) Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, Chaitman BR, Ewy GA, Fleischmann KE, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery–executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39: 542-53.

(10.) Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:651-4.

(11.) Fletcher GF, Balady G, Froelicher VF, Hartley LH, Haskell WL, Pollock ML. Exercise standards. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 1995;91:580-615.

(12.) Gerson MC, Hurst JM, Hertzberg VS, Doogan PA, Cochran MB, Lim SP, et al. Cardiac prognosis in noncardiac geriatric surgery. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103(6 Pt 1):832-7.

(13.) American College of Physicians. Guidelines for assessing and managing the perioperative risk from coronary artery disease associated with major noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 1997;127: 309-12.

(14.) Eagle KA, Coley CM, Newell JB, Brewster DC, Darling RC, Strauss HW, et al. Combining clinical and thallium data optimizes preoperative assessment of cardiac risk before major vascular surgery. Ann Intern Med 1989;110:859-66.

(15.) Vanzetto G, Machecourt J, Blendea D, Fagret D, Borrel E, Magne JL, et al. Additive value of thallium single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial imaging for prediction of perioperative events in clinically selected high cardiac risk patients having abdominal aortic surgery. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:143-8.

(16.) Christopherson R, Beattie C, Frank SM, Norris EJ, Meinert CL, Gottlieb SO, et al. Perioperative morbidity in patients randomized to epidural or general anesthesia for lower extremity vascular surgery. Perioperative Ischemia Randomized Anesthesia Trial Study Group. Anesthesiology 1993;79:422-34.

(17.) Christopherson R, Glavan NJ, Norris EJ, Beattie C, Rock P, Frank SM, et al. Control of blood pressure and heart rate in patients randomized to epidural or general anesthesia for lower extremity vascular surgery. Perioperative Ischemia Randomized Anesthesia Trial (PIRAT) Study Group. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8:578-84.

(18.) O’Hara DA, Duff A, Berlin JA, Poses RM, Lawrence VA, Huber EC, et al. The effect of anesthetic technique on postoperative outcomes in hip fracture repair. Anesthesiology 2000;92:947-57.

(19.) Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 2000;321:1493-7.

(20.) Urwin SC, Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:450-5.

(21.) McPhail N, Calvin JE, Shariatmadar A, Barber GG, Scobie TK. The use of preoperative exercise testing to predict cardiac complications after arterial reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 1988;7:60-8.

(22.) Das MK, Pellikka PA, Mahoney DW, Roger VL, Oh JK, McCully RB, et al. Assessment of cardiac risk before nonvascular surgery: dobutamine stress echocardiography in 530 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1647-53.

(23.) Mangano DT, Layug EL, Wallace A, Tateo I. Effect of atenolol on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1713-20.

(24.) Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, van de Ven LL, Blankensteijn JD. The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1789-94.

BERNARD M. KARNATH, M.D., is assistant professor of internal medicine at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. He received his medical degree from the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, where he also served an internship and residency in internal medicine.

Address correspondence to Bernard M. Karnath, M.D., 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0566 [e-mail:]. Reprints are not available from the author.

COPYRIGHT 2002 American Academy of Family Physicians

COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group