Sciatic nerve of normal and T200x5R Swiss white mice fails to support multiplication of intraneurally injected M. leprae

Sciatic nerve of normal and T200x5R Swiss white mice fails to support multiplication of intraneurally injected M. leprae

Shetty, Vanaja P

Sciatic Nerve of Normal and T200x5R Swiss White Mice Fails to Support Multiplication of Intraneurally

Injected M. Ieprael

Involvement of the peripheral nerve is the special and most important feature of leprosy in man. There are several issues concerning the formation of neural granuloma and the special relationship between Mycobacterium leprae and the peripheral glia that remain unclear for lack of a suitable animal model depicting the spectral disease seen in humans. With this objective in mind, we chose to work on a murine model wherein viable M. leprae were microinjected into the sciatic nerve bypassing the blood-nerve barrier in normal and immunosuppressed Swiss white (S[W) mice. A predominant epithelioid and a macrophage granuloma were readily obtained in normal and in thymectomized-irradiated (TR) mice, respectively (2,11). Therefore, it was felt that this model might serve as a window for studying the neural pathogenesis in leprosy. In order to obtain further insight into the fate of M. leprae exposed to the intraneural milieu, in the present study the viability, fold increase and clearance, if any, of M. leprae injected intraneurally were assessed sequentially using semiquantitative measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals. Random bred male and female Swiss white (S/W) mice maintained under standard laboratory condition were used.

Experimental design. A total of eight experiments were carried out, using either human- (freshly obtained nodule biopsy from untreated lepromatous patient) or armadillo-derived M. leprae (liver biopsy frozen at -70degC obtained from Dr. Eleanor Stores (WHO-THELEP) in groups of normal and TR (T200x5R) mice. The results thus obtained were compared.

Immunosuppression. Three- to fourweek-old, S/W female mice were thymectomized and the whole body was irradiated with five doses of 200 rads each at biweekly intervals (3). Intraneural inoculation was carried out 2 weeks after the last dose of irradiation.

Preparation of M. leprae suspension. Tissues were homogenized and bacterial suspensions were prepared using the standard procedure (13). Bacterial suspensions thus obtained were used within 24 hr. The size of the inocula used ranged between 4 to 40 x 10^sup 6^ bacilli suspended in a constant volume of 10 pl of normal saline. The baseline viability of the M. leprae inocula used for the intraneural injection was determined at this point using the foot pads of normal S/W mice. For this purpose, inocula not exceeding 1 x 10^sup 4^ per foot pad were injected into both hind foot pads of 8-10 normal S/W mice. Harvests were carried out at months 6, 7, 8, and 12 postinoculation to record the fold increase and percentage take.

Intraneural injection. Mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 1% pentobarbital sodium. Both right and left sciatic nerves were exposed aseptically from under the biceps femoris, lifted from the surrounding tissue, and the M. leprae suspension was injected into the endoneurial space using a glass micropipette attached to a Hamilton syringe through a 1/2″ canula. Formation of a bleb within the nerve at the site of injection was used as a marker for a successful transfer (60%70%). The wound was closed using sterile suture.

Biopsy. In experiments using armadillo M. leprae, the nerve biopsies were obtained at 24 hr, 72 hr, I week, and 2, 3, 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks following intraneural injection of M. leprae. In experiments using human-derived M. leprae, biopsies were obtained only at select intervals for want of inocula (Table 1). A minimum of three mice (six nerves) were biopsied each time. Before biopsy, the mice were examined for clinical signs of hind limb weakness. Mice were sacrificed using ether anesthesia. The sciatic nerve was exposed surgically and changes such as adhesion, swelling and thickening, if any, at the site and along the length of the nerve were recorded. The whole length of the nerve was dissected out and transferred to a sterile vial containing a few drops of minimal essential medium (MEM) and stored in an ice bucket until homogenization. Both left and right hind foot pads, the liver, spleen, earlobes and the regional lymph nodes were also collected at regular intervals for homogenization to check for bacterial dissemination.

Quantitation of bacterial load in the nerve. Using aseptic measures, the biopsied sciatic nerves were cleaned using MEM containing penicillin to clear all of the epineurial and most of the perineurial tissues. Nerves thus cleaned individually were transferred to a I -ml capacity glass homogenizer and homogenized using a fixed volume (0.25 ml) of normal saline per nerve. From the homogenate thus obtained, spot slides were prepared, fixed and stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen method. The bacterial load per nerve was determined.

Viability tests using mouse foot pad method. After determining the bacterial load per nerve, the nerve homogenates were pooled for each interval and injected into the foot pads of normal S/W mice with an inoculum not exceeding I x 104 M. leprae/foot pad. The foot pad harvests were carried out at months 6, 7, 8, and/or 12 postinoculation (Table 2).

Determination of loss of M. leprae between zero and 24 hr. In order to determine the extent of loss of M. leprae, between zero and 24 hr after intraneural injection, two separate experiments were carried out (Table 3) using armadillo M. leprae. In these experiments endoneural and epineurial tissues were separately and individually harvested in order to determine the seepage, into the epineural compartment during the injection.

In order to check the spread of M. leprae along the length of the nerve, in two of the experiments (in Table I Nos. 5 and 8) the whole length of the nerve was divided into three segments, i.e., a) the middle 2-cm length to include the site of injection; b) the proximal and c) the distal parts of the nerve were separately homogenized and counts were taken.

RESULTS

M. leprae yield/nerve at sequential intervals following intraneural injection. A total of 210 counts per nerve were obtained at sequential intervals beginning 24 hrs, 72 hrs, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. The over-all results (Table 1) show that approximately I out of 10 of the total inocula was recovered from the endoneural compartment of the nerves at 24 hr. Further, for reasons not very clear, the average recovery of M. leprae per nerve at 72 hr was 10 times higher. At the subsequent intervals until month 6, the counts were comparable to the 24-hr yield per nerve. Most importantly, there was neither a significant increase nor a decrease in the M. leprae yield per nerve in any of the experiments carried out, using either normal or T200x5R mice.

Baseline viability of M. leprae used in intraneural experiments. Both human-derived M. leprae (nodule biopsies from two untreated lepromatous patients) inoculations into the foot pads of normal S/W mice gave a maximal fold increase of 101 per foot pad and the take was 100% (results not shown).

The armadillo-derived M. leprae used in the remaining two experiments were similarly tested at three intervals, once on arrival and once each time before use in the first and the last experiments. On arrival, maximal yield was 10^sup 6^ per foot pad and take was 100%, like that of the human-derived M. leprae. The viability test carried out the second and third time, i.e., after 2 and 2 1/2 years of storage at -70degC, showed a maximal fold increase of 10^sup 5^ at month 12; the take was 100%, but the data suggest that there was a decline in viability on prolonged storage.

Viability of M. leprae derived from intraneural experiments. In order to determine the Viability of M. leprae exposed to the intraneural milieu for different lengths of time (24 hr to 12 months), a total of 46 such pooled inocula obtained at sequential intervals from experiments 1 to 8 were tested using the foot pads of normal mice. The foot pad harvests were carried out 6, 7, 8, and/or 12 months postinoculation. Viable bacteria were detected only in the inocula that were obtained between 24 hr and 4 weeks. However, as compared to baseline, all inocula obtained from the intraneural experiments gave a fold increase that was less than baseline values by 10-fold. Further, only a few counts reached the ceiling of 101 in the experiments using armadillo M. leprae. The results obtained with human-derived M. leprae were comparatively better, both in terms of percentage take as well as fold increase. Beyond 4 weeks, however, there was a sharp decline, and a total loss of viability was noted by 12 months with inocula obtained from both normal and TR mice using human- as well as armadillo-derived M. leprae.

In the present experiment there was no significant loss of the inocula between zero and 24 hr as ascertained in two separate sets of experiments.

No detectable M. leprae were obtained in other tissues tested except in the regional lymph nodes in which small numbers of bacilli were obtained during the early intervals (results not shown). No significant M. leprae counts were obtained in either the proximal or the distal segments, thus excluding any spread along the length of the nerve up to 12 months after inoculation. Therefore, it was concluded that the M. leprae inocula remained highly contained.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, the fate of M. leprae injected into the sciatic nerve in normal and TR mice was investigated using semiquantitative methods. The over-all results show that the freshly harvested M. leprae that were injected into the sciatic nerve remained within the nerve in a highly contained manner. While the number of M. leprae remained by and large unchanged between 24 hr and 6 months, viable bacteria were detected only until 4 weeks after inoculation. Thus, the intraneural compartment failed to sustain the viability and support the multiplication of M. leprae in either the normal or the TR mice under these experimental conditions.

The intraneural route of inoculation has its limitations. First and foremost, a successful inoculation could be achieved in only 60% to 70% of the cases even with experience. Secondly, less than one-tenth of the inoculum could be recovered from the endoneurium at 24 hr. Seepage of part of the inoculum into the epineurial compartment was unavoidable which, in turn, resulted in wider variations in the M. leprae yield per nerve. Despite these limitations certain obser-vations deserve further discussion.

There were potentially instructive differences between the present intraneural model and the well -established mouse foot pad model (10). Contrary to our expectation, seeding of M. leprae into the endoneural compartment, and thus bypassing the blood-nerve barrier, failed to allow the bacilli to retain their viability and failed to support their multiplication even in T200x5R mice. This was unlike the foot pad where 100- and 1000-fold increases are normally obtained by months 12 and 16 postinoculation in normal and T200x5R mice, respectively (1). With the intraneural route of infection, the specific granulomatous reaction peaked at 3 to 4 weeks (2,11), and this coincides with further loss of viability of M. leprae. The loss in viability did not show any relevance to the type of infiltrating cells. Unlike this, following foot pad inoculation of M. leprae appreciable granulomatous reaction at the site occurs much later, i.e., 2 to 2/2 years after the foot pad inoculation (7,10). In the foot pad model, distinct and reproducible pathological changes occur in the sciatic nerves in mouse strains such as CBA, C57 and S/W Contrary to earlier claims (7), however, M. leprae and granulomatous infiltrate were conspicuously absent in the nerve lesions that were followed up for 2 1/2 years in our laboratory using the C57 and S/W strains of mice (2).

With the intraneural route of infection in mice there was a specific inflammatory response (Fig. 1) and ensuing damage to nerve fibers, but M. leprae were not traced to the Schwann cells (Figs. 2 and 3) during the 1-year course of the study. This is unlike the well-documented findings in vitro in which M. leprae were readily phagocytized by both human and murine Schwarm cells Several well-documented studies in armadillos show that the entry of M. leprae into the nerves is highly restricted despite a disseminated infection (4,9,14). This was also the observation in nude mice (5). In armadillos, it was noted that the average time taken to develop disseminated infection was 12 to 29 months. Animals given a low dose of bacilli, i.e., 1 X 10^sup 3^, intradermally developed infection sooner than infected with a larger dose, i.e., 3.5 x 10^sup 7^. It was thought that the larger dose might have sensitized the animals and delayed the development of generalized infection. There was no significant difference otherwise in the susceptibility of the animals related to the routes used, i.e., intravenous and subcutaneous, or the dose of infection (4). A more recent ultrastructural study reports a striking preponderance of M. leprae in the endothelial cells around the nerve, i.e., epineurium and perineurium (1). This and several other manifestations of the disease in the armadillo are unlike that in humans. The early response of traumatized rabbit tibial nerve to epineurial infection with M. leprae revealed phagocytosis of M. leprae by the macrophages at the site. There was no further follow Up (2). To our knowledge, there is no documented long-term study using the intraneural route of infection with viable M. leprae in animals.

In conclusion, the peripheral nerve compartment in both normal and T200x5R mice failed to support the multiplication of M. leprae. There was a highly effective localization and containment of M. leprae infection within the endoneural compartment. Therefore, the peripheral nerve in S/W mice was neither a favored nor a protected site for M. leprae multiplication under these experimental conditions. Is this related to the difference in temperature at the site or could it be a reflection of a species-related difference in tissue tropism? In our opinion, there are several indicators that favor the latter.

SUMMARY

In a preliminary study we have shown that freshly harvested Mycobacterium leprae, when injected into the sciatic nerve in normal and immunosuppressed (TR) mice, induce massive but localized epithelioid and macrophage granuloma, respectively, in 3-4 weeks. In order to determine the fate of M. leprae injected intraneurally into normal and TR mice, in the present study we measured sequentially the viability, fold increase and clearance, if any, using semiquantitative methods. The average M. leprae yield per nerve assessed at regular intervals, beginning at 24 hr and including 72 hr, I week, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks, showed neither a significant increase nor a decrease in either the normal or the TR mice. The viability of M. leprae, assessed using the standard mouse foot pad method, showed a significant decrease as compared to baseline growth effective at 24 hr and remained static until approximately 4 weeks. A further decline and total loss of viability was noted by 12 months. The results show that injection of M. leprae via the intraneural route in both normal and TR mice failed to sustain the viability and failed to support the multiplication of the organisms.

RESUMEN

En un estudio preliminar demostramos que Mycobacterium leprae recien aislado, inyectado en el nervio cidtico de ratones, induce, en 3-4 semanas, granulomas epitelioides en ratones normales y granulomas macrofdgico en animales inmunosprimidos (TR). Para determinar el destino de los bacilos en estos animales, en el presente estudio medimos secuencialy semicuantitativamente la viabilidad, la multiplicaci6n y la depuracion de los bacilos. El numero promedio de bacilos por nervio a las 24 h, 72 h, I semana, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24 y 48 semanas, no mostr6 cambios ni en los ratones normales ni en los ratones TR. La viabilidad de M. leprae, segdn el m6todo etsdndar de la amohadilla plantar del raton, se encontro significativamente disminuida en comparaci6n con la viabilidad del bacilo observada a las 24 h de inoculacion y permanecio estatica hasta aproximadamente 4 semanas. Despues, a los 12 meses se obscrvo una posterior declinacion y la podida total de la viabilidad. Los resultados muestran que la inyeccion de M. leprae via la ruta. intraneural en ratones normales y en ratones inmunosuprimidos, no sostiene ni la viabilidad ni la multiplicacion del microorganismo.

RESUME

Dans une etude pretiminaire, nous avons montre que des Mycobacterium leprae recemment recoltees et injectees dans le nerf sciatique de souris normales on inunosupprim6es (TR) provoquent la formation massive mais locale de granulbmes macrophagiques de type epithelidides on histiocytaires, respectivement, en 3 on 4 semaines. Dans cette etude, afin de determiner le devenir de M. leprae apres une injection intraneuronale de M. leprae chez des souris normales ou TR, nous avons mesure, de faqon sequentielle et si cela etait approprie, la viabiliW, les facteurs de croissance et d’elimination par des methodes semi-quantitatives. Le rendement moyen de M. leprae par nerf, evalue A des intervalles de temps reguliers, debutant A 24 heures et incluant 72 heures, I semaine, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24, et 48 semaines n’a revele ni d’augmentation ni de diminution significative que les souris ffirent TR on normales. La viabilite de M. leprae, evaluee par la methode standard d’inoculation dans la patte de souris, a montre une diminution significative des 24 heures, compar6e aux valeurs de croissance basales avant inoculation. Cette diminution resta constante jusqu’a approximativement 4 semaines, puis un second declin et une perte totale de viabilite furent notes autour de 12 mois. Ces resultats indiquent que l’injection intra-neurale de M. leprae ne permet pas la survie et ne soutient pas la multiplication de cet organisme chez les souris normales on immunosupprim6es (TR).

Acknowledgment. We thank Ms. Jayalakshmi for typing the manuscript and Ms. Anju Wakdde for her technical assistance.

1 Received for publication on 6 July 1999. Accepted for publication in revised form on 7 September 1999.

REFERENCES

1. BALENTINE, J. D., CHANG, S. C. and ISSAR, S. L. Infection of armadillos with M. leprae-ultrastructural studies of peripheral nerve. Arch. Pathol. Lab Med. 100 (1976) 175-181.

2. CHAND, S. M. and CHACKO, C. J. G. An ultrastructural study of the response of traumatized rabbit tibial nerve and epineural infection with M. leprae. Int. J. Lepr. 54 (1986) 79-83.

3. COLSTON, M. J. Application of thymectomized irradiated mouse to the detection of persisting Mycobacterium leprae. Int. J. Lepr. 50 (1982) 83-89.

4. JOB, C. K., SANCHEz, R. M. and HASTINGS, R. C. Manifestations of experimental leprosy in the armadillo. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 34 (1985) 151-161.

5. KoHSAKA, K., MORI, T. and ITO, T. Lepromatoid lesion developed in nude mouse inoculated with Mycobacterium leprae; animal transmission of leprosy. Lepra 54 (1977) 177-187. [Abstract in Int. J. Lepr. 45 (1977) 403-404].

6. MUKHERJEE, R., MAHADEVAN, P. R. and ANTIA, N. H. Organized nerve cultures 1: a technique to study the effect of M. leprae infection. Int. J. Lepr. 48(1980)183-188.

7. REEs, R. J. W., BODDINGIUS, J. and WEDDELL, A. G. M. Studies to determine the pathogenesis of neural damage in mice infected with M. leprae. Int. I Lepr. 40 (1972) 92-93.

8. SAMUEL, N. M., CRAWFORD, C. L. AND GRANGE, J. M. Ultrastructure of human foetal Schwann cells

in tissue culture infected with Mycobacterium leprae. Lepr. Rev. 59 (1988) 17-24.

9. SCOLLARD, D. M., MCCORMICK, G. and ALLEN, J. L. Localization of Mycobacterium leprae to endothelial cells of epineural and perineural blood vessels and lymphatics. Am. J. Pathol. 154 (1999) 1611-1620.

10. SHEPARD, C. C. The experimental disease that follows the infection of human leprosy bacilli into foot pads of mice. I Exp. Med. 112 (1960) 445-454.

11. SHETTY, V. P. Animal model to study the mechanism of nerve damage in leprosy; a preliminary report. Int. J. Lepr. 61 (1993) 70-75.

12. SHETTY, V. P. and ANTIA, N. H. Animal model for leprous neuropathy-our contribution. Indian J. Lepr. 68 (1996) 95-104.

13. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. Laboratory techniques for leprosy. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1987, p. 4. CDS/LEP 86 (1987).

14. YOSHIZUMI, M. 0., KIRCHHEMIER, W. F. and AsBuRy, A. K. A light and electron microscopic study of peripheral nerve in an armadillo with disseminated leprosy. Int. J. Lepr. 42 (1974) 251-259.

Vanaja P. Shetty, Papinder S. Matharu, and Noshir H. Antia2

2 V 0. Shetty, Ph.D., Senior Research Officer@ P. S. Matharu, B.Sc.; N. H. Antia, F.R.C.S., FA.C.S. (Hon.), Director and Trustee, The Foundation for Medical Research, 84-A R.G. Thadani Marg, Worli, Mumbai 400 018, India.

Reprint requests to V. P Shetty, Ph.D., at the above address or FAX: 91-22-493-2876; e-mail: frchbom@bom2.vsnl.net.in

Copyright International Leprosy Association Dec 1999

Provided by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights Reserved